nobodysuspectsthebutterfly:

racefortheironthrone:

we hear about Wylla from another source than Robert and Edric. We also hear about Wylla from Godric Borrell, the Lord of Sisterton. There’s no explanation for that save Ned Stark spreading the story to make sure
that people have a cover story for Jon Snow.

We do not hear about Wylla from Borrell. No idea where you got that he named her. Also, your sequence of events is very off. You seem to think that Ned spread Wylla’s name and the rumor around the Sisters when he came home
from the Rebellion. But the story Borrell tells is about the beginning of the Rebellion, and is not about Wylla the wetnurse at all.

“Ned Stark was here?”
“At the dawn of Robert’s Rebellion. The Mad King had sent to the Eyrie for Stark’s head, but Jon Arryn sent him back defiance. Gulltown stayed loyal to the throne, though. To get home and call his banners, Stark had to cross the mountains to the Fingers and find a fisherman to carry him across the Bite. A storm caught them on the way. The fisherman drowned, but his daughter got Stark to the Sisters before the boat went down. They say he left her with a bag of silver and a bastard in her belly. Jon Snow, she named him, after Arryn.”

The only Wylla in ADWD is Wylla Manderly. And it’s far more likely that the gossipping Sistermen wanted to claim honorable Ned Stark’s famous bastard for their own than any rumor spread by Ned. (As it would have been about a year between the time Ned was in the Sisters and when he came home with Jon Snow.)

I am well aware that Borrell thinks that Jon Snow’s mother is a Sistertonian – could have sworn he used the name Wylla, but if I’m wrong, cheerfully retracted. I’m saying that Borrell got that idea in a “Telephone Game” style misremembering/hearing because Ned Stark helped to spread the story around, because he wanted people believing cover stories rather than thinking about Lyanna.

And I think it’s significant that Ned feels and acts differently about Ashara than Wylla. 

Remember Darth Vader’s famous “Nooooo”? That was my reaction when I read you endorsing the “Ned and Ashara were in love” idea. Jokes aside, I’d like to hear your reasons for supporting something that goes against my entire idea of Ned’s character in so many ways.

onionjulius:

racefortheironthrone:

him-e:

racefortheironthrone:

Sure, here are my reasons:

1. It’s clear from the text that Ned was strongly attracted to Ashara Dayne at the Tourney at Harrenhal. Ned’s an honorable man, but he’s someone with sexual passion and romantic desire too. And as neither he nor she was betrothed, their liaison is hardly dishonorable. 

2. I also think it feeds well into the central themes of Ned’s character – especially his being torn between honor and family, between duty and desire – and the overarching themes that GRRM is interested in (the human heart at war with itself). If Ned never felt anything for a woman before Catelyn, we don’t have the kind of conflict that we had in Catelyn’s case. In fact, wrt to the whole “promise me, Ned” thing, if Ned had nothing to do with Ashara Dayne, there’s no reason for her to exist as a red herring when you already have Wylla to perform that function. 

2a. If he did, then we have a better case of those themes at work. Ned was in love with one woman, but honor forced him to marry another. Then his desire to protect his family destroyed the woman he loved, and then poisoned his marriage. 

3. It also creates a nice parallel between Ned and Catelyn – both of them got married for the sake of their families, both of them entered into the marriage while being in love with someone else, and neither of them were in love with or particularly attracted to the other partner initially, and then grew to have more. 

4. I think it also works better to explain Ashara Dayne. If all she is to Ned is one of Brandon’s exes, why does he care about her? Why insist that her name not be mentioned, when he goes to some lengths to ensure that Wylla’s name is spread around? Why have there be rumors or have her in the story of the Knight of the Laughing Tree, when Lyanna is really the main point of that story? Likewise, it makes her eventual fate and Ned’s final meeting that much more meaningful – it’s a lot less tragic for her ex’s brother to kill her brother than for her lover to kill her brother. 

5. I also think it works to explain Brandon Stark’s character. It’s one thing for him to be a hot-headed horn-dog who Ned somewhat resents for being daddy’s favorite and having to live Brandon’s life for him. It’s another thing for him to be an emotionally abusive asshole who encourages his brother’s affections for Ashara Dayne only to turn around and immediately seduce her. Why would Ned build a tomb against tradition for the latter?  

I’m not sure if we can take Ned’s reaction as evidence that he had an affair with Ashara, as I always thought the sore spot here is Jon, not Ashara, who comes almost as an afterthought in the sense of “why the hell are you nosing around, my lady?”. He is mad at Catelyn for asking something he already gave an explanation for, and for buying into the gossips of the servants who, for all he knows, could be making all kinds of speculation around Jon’s parentage, including the ones in the right direction. So he scares her for good which has the expected result – the whispering stops altogether and no one in Winterfell talks about Jon’s mother again. I feel like Ned’s uncharacteristically angered reaction makes much more sense if we think what the stakes are for keeping Jon’s parentage secret – if the truth is discovered, then Jon might be killed and Ned himself would be in serious trouble with the king – rather than Ned just being angsty about a lost love of his youth, no matter how tragic it was.

If the sore spot is Jon not Ashara, why doesn’t he flare up around Wylla? He’s got no problem throwing her name around with Robert. If he didn’t care about Ashara, then gossip about her is good – it distracts from Lyanna being a possible mother for Jon. 

RE: your targets, If Ned wasn’t betrothed, there’s no reason for the child to be a bastard. Everyone would understand if they got married and then Ashara had a conveniently large “premature” baby. There’s no dishonor there. 

Catelyn and Brandon were not really in love. She maybe had an attachment to him and/or thought he was hot and/or romanticized him, but GRRM has said that she didn’t know him very well.

I didn’t think they were in love, but certainly mutual attraction. Hence the quote from ASOS.

Remember Darth Vader’s famous “Nooooo”? That was my reaction when I read you endorsing the “Ned and Ashara were in love” idea. Jokes aside, I’d like to hear your reasons for supporting something that goes against my entire idea of Ned’s character in so many ways.

evelynvincible:

racefortheironthrone:

Sure, here are my reasons:

1. It’s clear from the text that Ned was strongly attracted to Ashara Dayne at the Tourney at Harrenhal. Ned’s an honorable man, but he’s someone with sexual passion and romantic desire too. And as neither he nor she was betrothed, their liaison is hardly dishonorable. 

2. I also think it feeds well into the central themes of Ned’s character – especially his being torn between honor and family, between duty and desire – and the overarching themes that GRRM is interested in (the human heart at war with itself). If Ned never felt anything for a woman before Catelyn, we don’t have the kind of conflict that we had in Catelyn’s case. In fact, wrt to the whole “promise me, Ned” thing, if Ned had nothing to do with Ashara Dayne, there’s no reason for her to exist as a red herring when you already have Wylla to perform that function. 

2a. If he did, then we have a better case of those themes at work. Ned was in love with one woman, but honor forced him to marry another. Then his desire to protect his family destroyed the woman he loved, and then poisoned his marriage. 

3. It also creates a nice parallel between Ned and Catelyn – both of them got married for the sake of their families, both of them entered into the marriage while being in love with someone else, and neither of them were in love with or particularly attracted to the other partner initially, and then grew to have more. 

4. I think it also works better to explain Ashara Dayne. If all she is to Ned is one of Brandon’s exes, why does he care about her? Why insist that her name not be mentioned, when he goes to some lengths to ensure that Wylla’s name is spread around? Why have there be rumors or have her in the story of the Knight of the Laughing Tree, when Lyanna is really the main point of that story? Likewise, it makes her eventual fate and Ned’s final meeting that much more meaningful – it’s a lot less tragic for her ex’s brother to kill her brother than for her lover to kill her brother. 

5. I also think it works to explain Brandon Stark’s character. It’s one thing for him to be a hot-headed horn-dog who Ned somewhat resents for being daddy’s favorite and having to live Brandon’s life for him. It’s another thing for him to be an emotionally abusive asshole who encourages his brother’s affections for Ashara Dayne only to turn around and immediately seduce her. Why would Ned build a tomb against tradition for the latter?  

Does Godric Borrell name the fisherman’s daughter as Wylla? Because it seems to me Godric is talking about a different person entirely — a common girl from the Sisters, not a handmaiden/wet nurse from Dorne.
And even if Wylla’s name was known, there are other reasons this would be so. It’s likely she traveled to Winterfell with Ned and Jon, as Jon would have needed a wet nurse for the journey, and Catelyn notes that there was an unnamed wet nurse with Jon and Ned when she first arrived at Winterfell. If Ned was putting about that Jon’s nurse was his mother, you’d better believe Cat would have known the girl’s name.

Yes, Ned’s reaction to hearing Ashara’s name was unusually intense. Ashara is a sensitive topic amidst a shitstorm of sensitive topics. Ned has just returned from war with three bodies to bury (father, brother, and sister), a bastard son whose identity he must protect, a wife he doesn’t fully know, the shame of having killed a great knight he respected (Arthur Dayne), the likely belief that a woman he loved is dead on account of news he himself delivered, and knowing that sharing any of this with his wife — that he and his brother were both in love with a dead girl a continent away — would hurt her more than it would help. 
Considering the amount of stress Ned was under at the time, and considering that he doesn’t know Catelyn, and in his grief likely does not want discuss a complicated and terribly sad topic like Ashara Dayne, his angry outburst seems pretty explicable to me.

I still disagree that it’s emotionally abusive for Brandon to make a play at a girl who is not interested in his brother. Yes, he encouraged Ned to give it a go. Ned and Ashara had a dance. If Ashara then decided she’d rather be involved with Brandon, that’s Ned’s loss. If Brandon encouraged Ned to make a move while planning all along to seduce Ashara himself, that’s one thing, but it doesn’t seem that that’s what happened.

Claiming that “honor doesn’t explain Brandon’s tomb at all” doesn’t give reasons for why you think so.
It seems perfectly logical to me that if Ned was constructing tombs for his father and sister, it would be a bit scandalous not to make one for his brother as well. After all, if Brandon had died minutes after Rickard, rather than minutes before, he would technically have died as Lord of Winterfell and merited his own tomb regardless.

TL;DR: My main point is that I think Ned was certainly interested in Ashara — probably much the way Barristan Selmy was — but that I don’t agree that Ashara necessarily reciprocated his feelings, and I don’t think her reciprocation is necessary to explain Ned’s feeling and actions.

He names her Wylla, but describes her as a fisherman’s daughter, but I think that point to Ned being very happy to spread a cover-story around. He doesn’t try to clamp down on Wylla’s name being thrown around the way he does with Ashara.

I still think in dramatic terms it works better for Ned tore up about “the woman whose shadow lay between them” if she was his lover than his brother’s ex.

We’re just going to have to agree to disagree about the emotionally abusive thing – especially if you know someone who’s normally rather introverted and shy feels this way, to encourage them to go above and beyond what they would normally do, and then sleep with that person the same night (and it seems pretty open if Ser Barristan found out about it), seems like you don’t really care about how they feel or how your actions affect them.

The reason why I don’t think honor applies is that honor isn’t a catchall term for “nice” or “good.” It refers to adhering to a code of public behavior and the way in which you are held in repute or disrepute for that behavior. Building a tomb for his father is traditional – not doing it would probably be considered disreputable, as you’re showing disrespect for your father and predecessor. But there was no expectation that Ned would build a tomb for either sibling – that was above and beyond the code, so it would be more motivated by how he felt about each sibling. And I don’t think he’d do that if he hated his sibling.

As for the reciprocity – her family believes it to have been reciprocated, and to me that’s the strongest evidence. Especially when the alternative is often couched in frankly sexist logic about how all women prefer bad boys. 

Remember Darth Vader’s famous “Nooooo”? That was my reaction when I read you endorsing the “Ned and Ashara were in love” idea. Jokes aside, I’d like to hear your reasons for supporting something that goes against my entire idea of Ned’s character in so many ways.

him-e:

racefortheironthrone:

Sure, here are my reasons:

1. It’s clear from the text that Ned was strongly attracted to Ashara Dayne at the Tourney at Harrenhal. Ned’s an honorable man, but he’s someone with sexual passion and romantic desire too. And as neither he nor she was betrothed, their liaison is hardly dishonorable. 

2. I also think it feeds well into the central themes of Ned’s character – especially his being torn between honor and family, between duty and desire – and the overarching themes that GRRM is interested in (the human heart at war with itself). If Ned never felt anything for a woman before Catelyn, we don’t have the kind of conflict that we had in Catelyn’s case. In fact, wrt to the whole “promise me, Ned” thing, if Ned had nothing to do with Ashara Dayne, there’s no reason for her to exist as a red herring when you already have Wylla to perform that function. 

2a. If he did, then we have a better case of those themes at work. Ned was in love with one woman, but honor forced him to marry another. Then his desire to protect his family destroyed the woman he loved, and then poisoned his marriage. 

3. It also creates a nice parallel between Ned and Catelyn – both of them got married for the sake of their families, both of them entered into the marriage while being in love with someone else, and neither of them were in love with or particularly attracted to the other partner initially, and then grew to have more. 

4. I think it also works better to explain Ashara Dayne. If all she is to Ned is one of Brandon’s exes, why does he care about her? Why insist that her name not be mentioned, when he goes to some lengths to ensure that Wylla’s name is spread around? Why have there be rumors or have her in the story of the Knight of the Laughing Tree, when Lyanna is really the main point of that story? Likewise, it makes her eventual fate and Ned’s final meeting that much more meaningful – it’s a lot less tragic for her ex’s brother to kill her brother than for her lover to kill her brother. 

5. I also think it works to explain Brandon Stark’s character. It’s one thing for him to be a hot-headed horn-dog who Ned somewhat resents for being daddy’s favorite and having to live Brandon’s life for him. It’s another thing for him to be an emotionally abusive asshole who encourages his brother’s affections for Ashara Dayne only to turn around and immediately seduce her. Why would Ned build a tomb against tradition for the latter?  

I’m not sure if we can take Ned’s reaction as evidence that he had an affair with Ashara, as I always thought the sore spot here is Jon, not Ashara, who comes almost as an afterthought in the sense of “why the hell are you nosing around, my lady?”. He is mad at Catelyn for asking something he already gave an explanation for, and for buying into the gossips of the servants who, for all he knows, could be making all kinds of speculation around Jon’s parentage, including the ones in the right direction. So he scares her for good which has the expected result – the whispering stops altogether and no one in Winterfell talks about Jon’s mother again. I feel like Ned’s uncharacteristically angered reaction makes much more sense if we think what the stakes are for keeping Jon’s parentage secret – if the truth is discovered, then Jon might be killed and Ned himself would be in serious trouble with the king – rather than Ned just being angsty about a lost love of his youth, no matter how tragic it was.

If the sore spot is Jon not Ashara, why doesn’t he flare up around Wylla? He’s got no problem throwing her name around with Robert. If he didn’t care about Ashara, then gossip about her is good – it distracts from Lyanna being a possible mother for Jon. 

RE: your targets, If Ned wasn’t betrothed, there’s no reason for the child to be a bastard. Everyone would understand if they got married and then Ashara had a conveniently large “premature” baby. There’s no dishonor there. 

You’ve mentioned before that you think Daenerys will roast fAegon in front of Varys. Do you think that will be after he fails the “dragon” test – i.e. he tries and fails to mount one of the dragons? There’s precedent for that with the way he completely froze up during the Bridge of Dreams sequence, and people with Targaryen blood have failed to mount dragons successfully before in the Dance of Dragons.

That would be thematically inappropriate.

Think Martin will give us a third novella to follow TRP and PQ? It feels like an unfinished little trilogy as is and it would be a nice, already written bone to throw us while we wait for Winds. Even though it seems like there was only one more major battle in the war itself, I’d love an in-depth look at the Hour of the Wolf and the early Regency Wars, which had to have been as bloody and back-stabby as anything else in Westerosi history. Anything you’d like to see in there if we got it?

I don’t think so, not until Fire and Blood is done. 

If we learn anything more about the Hour of the Wolf, I think it’ll be in She-Wolves of Winterfell.

Skimming WOIAF again and a cool little tidbit jumped out at me: The Company of the Rose, founded by Northmen who refused to submit to Aegon the Conqueror. Think they could still be around/show up in the main series? Also kind of hoping they were founded by Brandon Snow, Torrhen Stark’s bastard brother who wanted to use weirwood arrows to kill Aegon’s dragons. I’d love to hear more about him.

Their descendants, maybe – that’s 300 years ago. 

Remember Darth Vader’s famous “Nooooo”? That was my reaction when I read you endorsing the “Ned and Ashara were in love” idea. Jokes aside, I’d like to hear your reasons for supporting something that goes against my entire idea of Ned’s character in so many ways.

evelynvincible:

racefortheironthrone:

Sure, here are my reasons:

1. It’s clear from the text that Ned was strongly attracted to Ashara Dayne at the Tourney at Harrenhal. Ned’s an honorable man, but he’s someone with sexual passion and romantic desire too. And as neither he nor she was betrothed, their liaison is hardly dishonorable. 

2. I also think it feeds well into the central themes of Ned’s character – especially his being torn between honor and family, between duty and desire – and the overarching themes that GRRM is interested in (the human heart at war with itself). If Ned never felt anything for a woman before Catelyn, we don’t have the kind of conflict that we had in Catelyn’s case. In fact, wrt to the whole “promise me, Ned” thing, if Ned had nothing to do with Ashara Dayne, there’s no reason for her to exist as a red herring when you already have Wylla to perform that function. 

2a. If he did, then we have a better case of those themes at work. Ned was in love with one woman, but honor forced him to marry another. Then his desire to protect his family destroyed the woman he loved, and then poisoned his marriage. 

3. It also creates a nice parallel between Ned and Catelyn – both of them got married for the sake of their families, both of them entered into the marriage while being in love with someone else, and neither of them were in love with or particularly attracted to the other partner initially, and then grew to have more. 

4. I think it also works better to explain Ashara Dayne. If all she is to Ned is one of Brandon’s exes, why does he care about her? Why insist that her name not be mentioned, when he goes to some lengths to ensure that Wylla’s name is spread around? Why have there be rumors or have her in the story of the Knight of the Laughing Tree, when Lyanna is really the main point of that story? Likewise, it makes her eventual fate and Ned’s final meeting that much more meaningful – it’s a lot less tragic for her ex’s brother to kill her brother than for her lover to kill her brother. 

5. I also think it works to explain Brandon Stark’s character. It’s one thing for him to be a hot-headed horn-dog who Ned somewhat resents for being daddy’s favorite and having to live Brandon’s life for him. It’s another thing for him to be an emotionally abusive asshole who encourages his brother’s affections for Ashara Dayne only to turn around and immediately seduce her. Why would Ned build a tomb against tradition for the latter?  

I’m with you up until point four. 

If Ned was in love with Ashara, his affection for her would not necessarily be diminished by the fact that she spurned him in favor of Brandon, and it’s a bit spurious to claim Ned “[went] to some lengths to ensure that Wylla’s name is spread around.”

We only hear of Wylla twice: once from Robert Baratheon, and once from Edric Dayne. Robert puts forth Wylla as Jon’s mother, and Edric names her a wet nurse, from which Arya speculates that Wylla is Jon’s mother. But there are good reasons Wylla’s name, instead of Ashara’s, would be put forth in both cases.

  • Robert Baratheon would likely have known the truth of whether Ned was involved with Ashara; they were best friends,  Ashara was a great beauty, and she’s believed to have given birth to a (presumably stillborn) bastard around the time of Jon’s birth. If there was ANY chance of Ned being the father of Ashara’s child, Robert would know. 
  • Edric Dayne was raised at Starfall years after Ashara’s death; he did not hear about Wylla from Ned. Wylla was the official cover story for Jon so that Robert would not discover the truth. And, as stated above, Robert would have known if Ashara Dayne was Ned’s paramour.

As to why Ned would insist Ashara’s name not be mentioned: Some part of it may be that Ned still mourns for Ashara; that he was really into her, and her loss pains him. It also seems likely to me that Ned would want to spare Cat the knowledge that Brandon was philandering with other highborn women so near the date of their marriage. We have no indication that Cat new anything about Brandon’s sexual voracity (as Lyanna did with Robert), and Ned may still want his wife to think well of his brother.

The Laughing Tree story mentions Ashara because its gives us proof that the Starks and Daynes were (more than) friendly, which becomes significant if Ned later has to beg their help concealing Jon’s identity (especially on the heels of killing one of their proudest sons).

And Ashara’s suicide is still plenty tragic for Ned, regardless of whether she reciprocated his feelings. Ned is an honorable man. She’s not just his brother’s ex, she’s someone he loved, who he likely still has no desire to hurt.

Calling Brandon an emotionally abusive asshole who seduced his brother’s crush seems harsh. We know he asked Ashara to dance with Ned, and we have no reason to assume he had ulterior motives at that point.
But we also know that Brandon was more handsome, more outgoing, and more charming than Ned. If Ashara didn’t share Ned’s interest, it’s entirely possible she would have moved in on Brandon. Would it have been insensitive for him to reciprocate? Of course! But Brandon was a horn-dog, and it’s entirely in-character for him to have slept with her if she made her interest known.

Why would Ned have built a tomb for him against tradition? Honor. Brandon was his brother, he wanted to build a tomb for his sister, and he couldn’t very well go against tradition to build a tomb for his sister without doing one for his equally-dead brother. Ned’s an honorable man, and spurning his brother in this context would be ludicrously out of character for him.

We know that historically Ned had a crush on Ashara, but he’s not mourning her the way Robert mourns Lyanna. He barely thinks of Brandon at all. 
I don’t think its unreasonable at all to assume Ned was infatuated with Ashara to some degree, but there’s very little evidence that it was reciprocated, and Ashara’s presence in the story makes equally as much sense, if not more, if the Stark she loved was Brandon.

A couple points:

  1. we hear about Wylla from another source than Robert and Edric. We also hear about Wylla from Godric Borrell, the Lord of Sisterton. There’s no explanation for that save Ned Stark spreading the story to make sure that people have a cover story for Jon Snow.
  2. Ned’s reaction to Ashara’s name is unusually intense. “That was the only time in all their years that Ned had ever frightened her.” That’s more than just sparing Catelyn’s feelings, there’s a personal attachment there. 
  3. I don’t think it’s emotionally abusive for Brandon to have made a play at Ashara – I think it’s emotionally abusive for Brandon to have first encouraged Ned to make his affections known and then done that. 
  4. I don’t think “honor” explains Brandon’s tomb at all.