In a Hobbesian sense, when does Joffrey lose his right to rule? Is it when he shoots crossbows at the public, removing his status as the person preventing a return to the state nature, in bringing back the constant fear of death from anywhere? Or is it more the case that he never loses it, but merely grants the people overthrowing him the right of self-preservation, had they managed to lynch him during the Riot?

I don’t know if there’s one single event, but certainly between shooting starving subjects and touching off the riot. In essence, he becomes not a necessary restraining force on the violence inherent in human nature, but a force that’s actively encouraging violence. 

Guest Post at Tower of the Hand: The Blacks and Red Part IV, The Golden Company, Then and Now

Guest Post at Tower of the Hand: The Blacks and Red Part IV, The Golden Company, Then and Now

And…we’re done! The last part in the Blacks and Reds series, focusing on the Golden Company itself, its origin and purpose, its military structure, its role in the politics of Essos, the War of Ninepenny Kings, and its role in the story of A Song of Ice and Fire, is now up at Tower of the Hand!

Blackfyre

So go check it out!

View On WordPress

Graphic Policy Radio Talks Doctor Who

elanabrooklyn:

Hey folks: Graphic Policy Radio is cool and you should follow them on Tumblr. 

So do it now. 

Graphic Policy Radio Talks Doctor Who

Was the high sparrow withholding his blessing a tell that the faith under him wouldn’t recognize the current monarchy? And after, and even before, the conquest how did the faith work in the seven kingdoms and dorne

No, I think the withholding of the blessing was and is a bid for power within the current monarchy. 

The history of the Faith is a bit vague and confusing – we know that, for a long time, the High Septons were based in Oldtown and both independently powerful but also intently connected with highborn politics (the High Septon of the Revolt of the Faithful was a Hightower, for example). 

So I’m not quite sure how this worked politically. You’d think that the Vale, being the first settlement of the Andals, would have been the historic center of the Faith – can’t imagine they would have been happy with losing the influence and the economic advantages from all the pilgrims. Likewise, how do the Kings of the Rock or the Storm Kings or the Kings of the Rivers and Hills or the Kings of the Mountain and Vale feel about the Faith possibly having pro-Reach bias? My guess is that the Most Devout are apportioned to the Seven Kingdoms in such a way as to ensure that the other kingdoms are represented.  

Dorne’s an odd case – they’re officially of the Seven, but they seem less observant than other kingdoms. How exactly did they relate to a Faith under the thumb of the Targaryens when they weren’t? Not sure. 

Perhaps people are still arguing about the Red Weddings excessiveness because no one’s given much thought to “reasonable” alternatives. Lets say you are an alternative Walder Frey. You’re the same loathsome man who wants extremely satisfying disproportionate revenge upon everyone who has ever slighted you, but you have just enough good caution to decide against breaking a major taboo like guest right. How would you do in Robb Stark and the Tullys, raise up your family, and laugh about it?

tyrionsshrooms:

racefortheironthrone:

Rather than kill anyone, take them prisoner. Sell them to the Lannisters and let them do the killing. 

By not killing “anyone” you aren’t including the troops outside, are you?
I just to keep it front and center that the RW included more than just killing a few people dinner ala Tywin.

Well, the challenge was to describe a “reasonable” alternative. I don’t think killing the troops outside was necessary – the Boltons and Freys had them outnumbered, and we have plenty of examples of armies being effectively controlled through the holding hostage of their liege lords (see the Karstarks in TWOW). 

If Yohn Royce’s faction had overpowered Lysa and entered the war early on Robb’s side, how do you think they would have reacted on the North and Riverland secession from the Iron Throne? Would they have joined the new kingdom, left Robb or continued to fight for him as an ally?

Interesting question. If they’re already at war with the Lannisters, they can’t recognize Joffrey, and they’re kind of in the same dilemma that the North and the Riverlands were in at the end of AGOT.

Given the history between the North and the Vale, they’re probably not joining the Kingdom of the North without some really compelling reason – maybe a royal marriage between King Robert Arryn and Princess Sansa/Arya – but even then it’s iffy. They might continue as an independent ally, but that’s difficult politically.

OTHO, it’s quite possible that if the Vale is there in the council of war that the King in the North moment doesn’t happen. The Vale is one of the most consistently loyalist forces in Westeros – Robert’s Rebellion aside – so they might call for Renly (the smartest political move at the time), Stannis (the legal move at the time), or for a new Great Council to decide the succession.