Is there a functional difference between the Middle Ages feudal Lords and a warlord?

In the early Middle Ages, basically nothing. You look at the behavior of a Raoul of Cambrai, caring for nothing but strength of arms, totally dismissive of all forms of authority whether secular or religious, and you see someone whose way of life has not changed that much since the Franks rode into Gaul.

But over the years, culture accretes – you get the Peace of God and the Truce of God, the emergence of chivalric romance down in Acquitaine, the cultural impact of the Crusades, and so on and so forth. And by the time that you get to the 14th or 15th centuries, you’re dealing with people who their ancestors would not recognize. 

Considering the fact that Sybell Spicer is Maggy the Frog’s granddaughter. Is it possible that Sybell Westerling may have bewitched Robb Stark into marrying Jeyne? In order to get into Tywin’s graces and benefit from helping bring down the King in the North and receive some awards like Castamere?

Maggy may well have drugged Robb into sleeping with Jeyne, but what made Robb marry Jeyne is growing up in a household where the worst thing you could do is to sire a bastard. 

So if the Baratheon super genes overcome all others why aren’t Rhaenys, Laenor, Laena, and the grandkids all black haired and blue eyes? I find it hard to believe silver-purple phenotype is that different from blonde-green. The added incest can’t be used to explain it away since all of Robert’s bastards look like him no matter their mother. Any thoughts?

On a Doylist level, I think it’s GRRM being inconsistent. Sometimes Targaryen features seem to be recessive – as with Rhaenrya’s kids with Harwin Strong – and sometimes they seem less so. Baelor Breakspear and his children resembled Baelor’s Martell mother, but his brothers all had the Targaryen look; on the other hand, the Martells kept their look after Daenerys, the Baratheons kept their look after Rhaelle, and so forth. (Incidentally, in the text, only the Baratheon hair color is noted as being dominant, not the eyes.)

On a Watsonian level, I think Rhaenys got her coloration from her mother Jocelyn Baratheon’s Velaryon mother, which either skipped Boremund Baratheon or Boremund didn’t pass down to Borros, or Borros didn’t pass down to whoever followed him, since as far as I know he only had daughters. (Which, incidentally is a pretty major gap in our understanding of the Baratheon family tree…)

Hi, new reader here, your website is a godsend! Do you think the first and third estate (especially bourgeoisie) seem a little underdeveloped for plot or simplicity purposes? We don’t really see any “guilds” beyond the antler men and you’d think Dorne would have build some cities on the Greenblood since they don’t have fertile land (a la Egypt or Persia), right? Plus does the history of the faith make any sense at all? A highly centralized religion that develops its lead figure in just one realm

out of the blue? There doesn’t seem to be any organizational history in Essos (or crusade like endeavors for that matter) and some how none of the other kingdoms build up their own puppet religious head or organization. Wouldn’t it make more sense for them to each have a religious head competing for primacy, with unification occurring only under the Targaryens?

Hi, glad you like it!

As for the first estate, the organizational theory is not the part that I find odd. The Seven was the religion of the (at the time nomadic) Andals who underwent a mass migration under pressure from Valyrian expansion, so they wouldn’t leave behind any organizational structure, but they did when they put down roots. The part I do find odd is only partly the centralization, it’s more where the centralization happened – why down in the Reach in Oldtown and not in the Vale, where the Faith had been longest, or the Riverlands where there was the most religious conflict? And I do think there would have been some competition for prestige between the different kingdoms.

As for the third, I don’t think you’re right. We’ve got the guild of smiths in King’s Landing, and if they’re organized it’s likely that the other trades are – we know there’s a merchant’s guild in King’s Landing that Cersei deals with and we know there are multiple guildhalls in the city, we have the Guild of Alchemists in King’s Landing, Oldtown has an entire district where “west of the Honeywine, the Guildhalls lined the bank like a row of palaces,” there’s the Guild of Spicers in Qarth, the Ghiscari freeborn are guilded up the wazoo, the Braavosi have guilds and guildhalls, etc. 

You wrote: “There was no black-haired baby, Gendry is not her baby, none of those theories made any political sense whatsoever.” What about the possible clues left in by GRRM about Gendry’s mom having golden hair, and Cersei’s habit of using disguise? Would they be mere red herrings?

Those would not be possible clues. Gendry’s mother having fair hair is a clue that Robert only has black hair genes, Cersei using a disguise the one time is a complete non-sequitur. 

None of these theories hold up to any level of scrutiny. As Queen of Westeros, Cersei cannot conceal a pregnancy to term, nor could she easily escape the castle to raise a secret child in Flea Bottom, and her childbirths are incredibly scrutinized events. 

But even were it possible, it goes against basic motivation. Cersei didn’t want to have Robert’s child succeed to the Iron Throne. That being the case, she has no damn reason to go through a pregnancy when she could very easily end it, which she tells us she did in AGOT.

It always appeared to me that at least a small part of the reason why other characters despise Jaime is not only that he betrayed and murdered his king, but that he only did so at the last possible moment (so, if he’d been interested in defending his actions, “I did it for the good of the realm” wouldn’t sound very believable). If he (or any other Kingsguard) had instead intervened earlier, say at the murder of the Stark party, do you think the reception of the act would have been different?

Yeah that’s part of it. The bit in the show where Jaime and Ned talk during the feast and Ned says “you served well, when serving was safe” isn’t from the books, but I think the sentiment is probably there. So if Jaime had acted the moment Aerys had called for the murder of a Lord Paramount, I think it would be seen as a selfless and idealistic act, as opposed to being seen as part of the Lannisters’ switching sides.

I also think the method mattered. If Jaime had arrested Aerys instead of killing him, there would have been an argument that Jaime was fulfilling his oath as a knight to uphold justice and defend the innocent, and that Aerys’ fate would be in the hands of the law. If Aerys was armed, there would be at least the argument that it was an honorable duel. But killing an unarmed man, regardless of the other circumstances, is seen as dishonorable. 

Medieval prisons. It seems like fantasy focuses on dungeons, or on crow cages. Is that an accurate depiction?

That’s pretty accurate. Prisons are very expensive – not only the structure, but also the food, water, bedding, clothing, waste disposal, and medical care for the inmates, the personnel needed to provide these things, keep order in the prison, and prevent escapes, etc. 

Medieval governments usually didn’t have the fiscal or organizational capacity to run extensive prisons. So what you got instead were dungeons built into other facilities – the Tower of London was a royal residence, it was used as an armory and treasure-house because it was quite secure (hence why it still holds the crown jewels today), it was used for various government offices (the Royal Mint, and down in the basement they put the dungeons. And having visited quite a few castles when I was a youngun’, I can tell you, dungeons are small. Not only are the rooms quite cramped, but there just aren’t that many cells – maybe a dozen but usually less. Compare that to modern prisons with their hundreds if not thousands of inmates. 

By contrast, exemplary physical punishment, whether we’re talking about crow cages or stocks/pillories or executions, are cheap. You only need one or maybe a few official torturers/executioners, some tools, a wooden platform, and a good spot at a public market so that people can watch. And once you’re done with the offender, you let them go or throw away the body. 

Do you think Sybelle Spicer pimped out her daughter? I find it suspicious that pretty maiden daughter was attending to Robb and not her mother or the maester.

I don’t think she ordered Jeyne to sleep with Robb, because A. the odds of Jeyne agreeing to do that, even if it was necessary to save their family, were really low, and B. her modus operandi is usually to lie to her daughter and use drugs instead. 

At the very least, I think Sybell ordered Jeyne to care for Robb, thinking that caring for a handsome conqueror king might cause her to fall prey to the Florence Nightingale Effect. But given that Sybell’s grandmother was Maggy the Frog, and that Maggy may well have taught her how to make “cures and love potions and the like,” along with the recipe for moon tea, it’’s quite possible she drugged either or both of Robb and Jeyne to “make certainty doubly sure.”

And I’m very certain that she did so after negotiating her deal with Tywin, which is incredibly cold-blooded. While some pretty awful things are going to happen in the Prologue of TWOW, I hope her death at Lady Stoneheart’s hands is the silver lining.