You’ve basically described classical Troy.
Category: Uncategorized
I’m currently reading through your CBC analysis of Dany’s AGOT chapters and I was wondering, do you think we’ll learn more about the Dothraki culture in TWOW? Particularly the dosh khaleen?
Absolutely. And what’s even better is that we’ll get Dany’s Season 6 plot…but well-written.
Does a cup-bearer have to be at a certain age? From what I understood, it was a grown man position in medieval times. Yet, we see Tywin becoming a royal cup-bearer at 10 or 11. Also, did the Mistress of the Robes have to be unwed like the ladies-in-waiting?
Ah, this one I can answer!
So GRRM has somewhat fused the office of cup-bearer with the office of page (although it’s complicated by the fact that he also uses the term page), which is creating the confusion.
From the ancient world through to early modern Europe, the office of cup-bearer was indeed an adult position of respect and influence. In order to prevent poisoning, monarchs appointed trusted men (or women, we have examples of female cupbearers in Beowulf as well as in the Bible) to serve them drinks and ensure they weren’t poisoned (sometimes doing double-duty as food/drink-tasters as well). Indeed, a sign of how important the position could be is that Sargon of Akkad, the founder of the Akkadian Empire, began his career as cup-bearer to the king of Kish, and that the King of Bohemia was given the office of Arch-Cupbearer to the Holy Roman Emperor during coronation rituals. Or for a less exalted but no less important version, you have the gentleman below, Sir David Murray, cup-bearer to King James VI of Scotland and future Lord Scone and Viscount Stormont.

By contrast, the office of page was an age-gated one, which sons of the nobility would likely occupy from age 7-14 before they graduated to be squires and then knights. Pages did odd jobs for their knight or lord – carrying messages, cleaning stuff, helping to arm and dress their master, etc. and for the purposes of this post, fetching food and drink for their master especially at table. In return, pages would be given room, board, livery, and education in the fundamentals of horse-riding and associated sports, combat, basic literacy, music and other pastimes, and above all, manners.

As for the Mistress of the Robes, no she didn’t have to be unmarried: see Harriet Sutherland-Leveson-Gower, Duchess of Sutherland, Mistress of the Robes to Queen Victoria, who held the post before and after her marriage. However, ladies-in-waiting don’t have to be unmarried either; there were in fact different titles used to describe married vs. unmarried ladies in waiting, so that in England an umarried lady-in-waiting would be called a “Maid of Honour”; in France it would be “dammes” vs. “damoiselles”; in Germany it would be ”staatsdame”
vs. “
hoffräulein,” and so on.
With the recent question about medieval ships, I’ve wondered about the feasibility of medieval cities or kingdoms maintaining large navies in peacetime for the purposes of fighting pirates and smugglers, as well as guarding their merchant shipping. Would it be possible for such a navy to keep a region of water almost entirely safe from pirates, and charge high (but still preferable to having an entire boat’s shipping stolen) fees upon the merchant ships using it? Would this setup be profitable?
You’re in luck; I did some research into this a while back. Historically speakin, both medieval kingdoms and cities maintained navies for that very purpose. As to whether you’d consider them large, that’s tricky – wooden fleets have a relatively limited lifespan (14 years on avg, if I recall correctly), so fleet sizes tended to wax and wane rather dramatically as you’d have a big build-up and then that batch of ships would have to be decommissioned all at the same time.
Now, “almost entirely safe from pirates” is a bit more complicated. The prevelance of piracy is driven by a number of factors: the relative power balance of different navies (if navies are weak in a given area because ships are needed elsewhere, it’s easier for pirates to operate), the extent to which political authority over a given body of water is fractured (i.e, the classic case of the Caribbean, where you had many different countries with competing colonies, which made policing difficult because pirates could cross jurisdictions easily; or modern-day Somalia, where the collapse of government authority on the mainland has given pirates a safe harbor to operate on), and the involvement of governments in piracy (in the case of the Spanish Main, when Spain and Portugal divided the New World between themselves, the English, Dutch, French, etc. went into the state sponsorship of piracy in a huge way, as well as claiming their own competing colonies).
Geography and coordination also play a big role – it’s easier to deal with a contained body of water or a given choke-point, and it’s much harder to deal with wide open areas where pirates can simply keep running from you, as the Romans found out when they tried to suppress piracy in Mare Nostrum. At first the Romans tried to attack particular pirate strongholds – like the Antonine expedition against the Cretan pirates – but pirates adapted by just moving elsewhere in the Mediterranean, which led to a futile game of whack-a-mole. It wasn’t until Pompey’s extraordinary commission that the Romans attacked the program by dividing up the whole sea into districts and then making a concerted west-to-east push with their navy that swept the pirates in front of them and penned them in to ever-smaller areas until they were wiped out.
Since you’re an Historian, I quess you’re the right person to ask :) ASOIAF is full of seafaring vocabulary; since I prefered to read all the series in the original language I could never figure out the different sizes and shapes of all the different ships cited in it (although, I reckon that even if I read them translated, I still couldn’t picture them in my mind to tell the truth…) What’s the difference between a galley/galleas/cog/carrack/etc.?
Good question!
A galley is a ship primarily powered by rowing, tends to be rather long and narrow with a relatively shallow draft. Galleys were the dominant seacraft in the Mediterranean from the classical era through to the 16th century, especially in the era before gunpowder weapons where naval combat focused on ramming and boarding.

A galleas is a heavier galley – they were higher on the sides, they were longer than galleys, and they were slower. They also tended to have more masts and thus more sails than galleys, relying less on oarpower (although they had oars) in order to use the saved space for gun-decks, which meant that they could pack a lot more firepower than a galley. In a sense, the galleas is a transitionary ship between the pre-gunpowder era and the gunpowder era of naval combat.

A cog is a sailing ship without oars, that emerged in the 10th century in the Baltic. Cogs are made from oak, have a single mast, and a square sail. They’re small ships designed for ocean-going commerce, not warships.

Carracks are larger sailing ships than cogs, with three or four masts, which were perfected by the Portugese in the 15th century. With more sails than the cog, you can sail a bigger ship faster, which made the carracks excellent for long sea-voyages and long-distance commerce, because their larger holds allowed you to carry more goods and supplies. When you think about the voyages of Columbus or Magellan, you’re thinking about carracks.

Chapter-by-Chapter Analysis: Jon I, ASOS
Chapter-by-Chapter Analysis: Jon I, ASOS

“Might be you fooled these others, crow, but don’t think you’ll be fooling Mance. He’ll take one look a’ you and know you’re false…”
Synopsis: Jon Snow meets Mance Rayder.
SPOILER WARNING: This chapter analysis, and all following, will contain spoilers for all Song of Ice and Fire novels and Game of Thrones episodes. Caveat lector.
(more…)
We learned how “The Red Widow” is an ancestor of Ser Jaime (as well the other lovable Lannister clan) and safe bet we learned about Ser Duncan the Tall and Old Nan leading to Hodor, but while I get the clues showing she is, how exactly would Brienne of Tarth be a descendant (assume a direct line) of Ser Duncan the Tall in a way that she doesn’t know since while lowborn, he was considering the greatest knight of his time?
I’m probably not the best person to ask about this (you might want to ask @goodqueenaly or @nobodysuspectsthebutterfly), but as far as I know, we don’t know exactly how such a connection came to pass.
All we know of the Tarth’s family tree is that “House Tarth of Evenfall Hall—an old family of Andal descent that boasts of ties to the Durrandons, the Baratheons, and more recently to House Targaryen.” One theory I’ve heard is that the Targaryen connection was one of Egg’s sisters who had an amour with Dunk and produced a child that was born legitimate, what we could call the Ossifer Plumm Theory, but it could have happened some other way.
Romani Open Society Fellow Responds to Peter David’s Anti-Romani Statements — The Beat
I interviewed the Romani activists that Peter David shouted at at New York Comic Con.
They’re a legit organization & they have specific asks for Marvel comics.
I also debunked the anti Roma statements Peter David made.
Signal-boosting b/c this is important.
Romani Open Society Fellow Responds to Peter David’s Anti-Romani Statements — The Beat
Ser Barristan is completely loyal to Daenerys, but how do you think he will react when he hears about Aegon? Until they discover he is not really Rhaegar’s son, he will believe the true Targaryen heir is alive, so do you think he will be tempted to abandon Daenerys and go to Aegon’s side?
Well, that assumes Barristan lives to find out, but I think he’s “picked his prince” as Hillary Mantel would put it.
I don’t really understand what the Tattered Prince means when he says he wants Pentos. Does he want to rule the city and impose a new ruling system? How exactly could anyone give that to him?
Yes, and by conquering Pentos.