Category: Uncategorized
Would they have had the budget and time needed to forge armor for Wun Wun before the battle began?
The showrunners or the Northmen?
Again, I can’t emphasize enough: give him a weapon. A ranseur, a halberd, a trident, a partisan, a pike, a bill hook, a corsqeue (bat wing or otherwise), a fouchard, a military fork, a fouchard-fork, a naginata, a nagamaki, a fukara yari, a voulge, a scythe, a bardiche, a poleaxe, a lochaber axe, a bohemian earspoon, a bec de corbin, an ox tongue, a spetum, a glaive, a guisarme, a glaive-guisarme, a glaive-quisarme-glaive, a longspear, a lucern hammer, ANYTHING.
A log.
No, seriously, given his size and strength compared to anything else that’s going to be on the field, an ideal weapon for Wun Wun is simply a really big log. He can wield it like a baseball bat and take out like ten or twenty guys at a go in one swing.
Hell, a small tree would work.
Would they have had the budget and time needed to forge armor for Wun Wun before the battle began?
The showrunners or the Northmen?
Again, I can’t emphasize enough: give him a weapon. A ranseur, a halberd, a trident, a partisan, a pike, a bill hook, a corsqeue (bat wing or otherwise), a fouchard, a military fork, a fouchard-fork, a naginata, a nagamaki, a fukara yari, a voulge, a scythe, a bardiche, a poleaxe, a lochaber axe, a bohemian earspoon, a bec de corbin, an ox tongue, a spetum, a glaive, a guisarme, a glaive-guisarme, a glaive-quisarme-glaive, a longspear, a lucern hammer, ANYTHING.
Show question! How could Jon have used wun-wun more effectively in the BOTB? It seems like a giant could be a worth while trump card if used correctly in a battle on an open field
Give him any weapon.
Show question here. In BotB the consensus seems to be something like “Jon’s tactics were dumb & lost the battle and Sansa had to bail him out”. I disagree. Jon did the best with the resources he had at his command and it was Sansa who nearly lost it by withholding game-changing info that cost countless northern lives. Had John knew about the vale forces his game plan would’ve been vastly different. Sansa seems to get a pass from the fandom on this. Your thoughts? Thanks!
I think both are true, although I would lean less towards Jon’s tactics being dumb and more that he didn’t actually use any because he went charging off on his own and spent the entire battle as a mere foot soldier.
If I might add something here, the underlying problem with the decisions of both characters is the show’s persistent attitude of “noble = stupid.” Jon and Sansa both got hit with this in different ways – Sansa in being arbitrarily untrusting and needlessly manipulative, Jon in doing…what Jon did.
I second the motion.
Re: the striking kings from the rolls issue, wasn’t that basically what William did with all of the previous kings of England? Edward the Elder and Edward the Confessor aren’t counted for the purposes of the regnal numbers of future Kings Edward.
I don’t think that one can be laid at William’s doorstep (compared to, say, the Harrying of the North). After all, there wasn’t an Edward for another hundred years after the Conquest, so the numbering decision was made by a different dynasty. And as far as I know, William made the Confessor’s supposed decision to make him heir a part of Norman propaganda, so it wouldn’t be to William’s interest to write him out.
What would the reaction of westeros be if knowledge of jon’s true parentage and the events of the tower of Joy were somehow publically revealed after ned and roberts death?
After both their deaths? I think it’s much trickier than people think, and it’s not going to be a case where everyone rushes to declare for The Hidden Prince. There’s going to be a lot of Baratheon loyalists, both of the Lannisterian and anti-Lannisterian varities, the North has declared its independence (the Iron Islands too, come to think of it), and there are rival Targaryen claimants who would dispute Jon’s right even if it were known that he was definitely legitimate.
Show question here. In BotB the consensus seems to be something like “Jon’s tactics were dumb & lost the battle and Sansa had to bail him out”. I disagree. Jon did the best with the resources he had at his command and it was Sansa who nearly lost it by withholding game-changing info that cost countless northern lives. Had John knew about the vale forces his game plan would’ve been vastly different. Sansa seems to get a pass from the fandom on this. Your thoughts? Thanks!
I think both are true, although I would lean less towards Jon’s tactics being dumb and more that he didn’t actually use any because he went charging off on his own and spent the entire battle as a mere foot soldier.
Whatever became of “Honest Tomas” Rhymer?
I ran out of steam when it came to writing up that campaign a while back, but the campaign ended on a dramatic cliffhanger where he discovered the location of his soul the moment that a major conspiracy was revealed, forcing him to choose between doing the right thing for the city and the right thing for himself.
As long as you’re thinking about the political maneuvering of 298, what do you think the ratio of “Carrot to Stick” of Robert’s procession North was? He definitely put a friendly face on the whole thing (visiting his best friend during a time of grief, offering a powerful office). On the other, he needed to keep the Starks in pocket after a key ally died, and you’ve frequently mentioned how visiting a vassal was a good way to “kill with kindness”. Was he worried about Ned stirring up trouble?
Mostly carrots, and Robert’s approach to Ned was all carrots.
However, hitting the Darrys on the way there and the way back was definitely a stick.