Would the vassals and smallfolk under the Brackens and Blackwoods share their liege lords’ rivalry due to border raids?

Good question! If I had to guess, there’s probably two simultaneous phenomena going on. 

For the folks who are definitively on one side of the border or the other, you’re going to get mirroring of the feud, because those smallfolk see their liege lords as “their” lords, their protectors, and the other side as the thieving, murdering bastards who keep raiding their lands. Indeed, a lot of these people are going to be the folks who the lords turn to first to make up their feudal levies, they’re going to have been involved in a lot of the fighting and raiding, so there’s a strong element of selective hypocrisy here, similar to how the border reivers from the 13th through the 17th centuries had their clan feuds on both sides of the Anglo-Scottish border, despite the fact that these clans were basically indistinguishable.

image

For the folks who are in the middle, things are going to be more complicated. Since the land shifts back and forth so much between Bracken and Blackwood, you’re not going to get clear-cut divisions of loyalty. Rather, there’s likely to be a lot of mixed loyalties, both inside families and between generations. Here, I’m reminded somewhat of a lot of the German peasants during the Thirty Years War who made sure to own a picture of both the Pope and Martin Luther and then swap them on the wall depending on which marauding army was passing through. 

Would giving Bittersteel Blackwood Hall be a prudent political move on Daemon’s part (Given his character, would he even consider this?) and in the same breath, should Daeron then have given Stone Hedge to Brynden? TY

Keep in mind, Daemon and Daeron would have had different political impulses – Daemon would have needed to reward those who helped him overthrow the old order, and would have been grappling with the need to replace the Great Houses who had almost all proven themselves his enemies. Daeron by contrast needed to balance punishment with mercy, in the hopes of preventing further rebellions. 

You recently stated that the Tullys were strangely not richly rewarded by the crown post-Dance, despite their loyalty to the Blacks. How would you rate the possibility of lord Kermit Tully marrying one of the Strong sisters, with the incomes of Harrenhal included in her dowry reverting to House Tully for x amount of years (back in the crown’s possession by the time Viserys gave it to the Lothstons)? Thoughts? – RSAFan

Not highly at all. For one thing, why would Lord Kermit want to marry into a family disgraced as Kinslayers and Kingslayers? 

For another, if that was the case, why wouldn’t the Tullys have claimed Harrenhal by right instead of for a limited period of time?

RFTIT Tumblr Weekly Roundup

RFTIT Tumblr Weekly Roundup

Hello folks! Well, it’s been a lousy week in a lousy year, but I’ve always preferred to react to these kinds of setbacks by redoubling my efforts. (Didn’t hurt that the news was so stressful that I wrote 2800 words of Bran I to avoid having to think about it…) So Bran I will definitely be ready for Monday morning, and in the meantime we have some really good (if occasionally morbid) stuff on the…

View On WordPress

Honor of House Lannister

For all Tywin’s talk of Tyrion bringing dishonor on his house and trying to restore it after Tytos, couldn’t it be argued that Tywin’s actions (along with help from his children) bring more dishonor on his house than his father did?  

The honor of his house has become a joke with people saying Lannisters have shit for honor and Kem’s “Lannisters are twisty snakes.”