Question, when you tagged you book post “Right to a Job”, were you talking about “Right to Work” legislation or something completely different? Because you’ve seemed fairly pro-union in the past.

They’re completely different. 

The right to a job, which is described in international circles as a “right to work” (hence why I prefer using the term right to a job, because it leads to less although not no confusion in U.S circles), is the idea that an individual has a right to earn a living and that if they can’t find work in the private sector, government has an oblgiation to provide a job for them. 

In other words, it’s a way of describing a job guarantee but emphasizing the right of the individual as opposed to the oblgiations of government. In the U.S context, it flows out of FDR’s Second Bill of Rights:

“In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all—regardless of station, race, or creed.

Among these are:

The right to a useful and remunerative job…”

So the right to a job comes from a left-wing, pro-labor background, whereas the “right to work” (for less) comes from a right-wing, anti-labor background. 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.