Chapter-by-Chapter Analysis: Tyrion XV, ACOK

Chapter-by-Chapter Analysis: Tyrion XV, ACOK

image
“His wits were coming back to him, however slowly. That was good. His wits were all he had.”
Synopsis: Tyrion wakes up to find he’s lost his nose, his job, and the credit for his victory.
SPOILER WARNING: This chapter analysis, and all following, will contain spoilers for all Song of Ice and Fire novels and Game of Thrones episodes. Caveat lector.
(more…)

View On WordPress

Chapter-by-Chapter Analysis: Theon VI, ACOK

Chapter-by-Chapter Analysis: Theon VI, ACOK

image
“If I die, I die friendless and abandoned. What choice did that leave him, but to live?”
Synopsis: Theon “wins” the Siege of Winterfell. And loses at life.
SPOILER WARNING: This chapter analysis, and all following, will contain spoilers for all Song of Ice and Fire novels and Game of Thrones episodes. Caveat lector.
(more…)

View On WordPress

Did the title “High King of Dorne” wound the pride of other realms? Of the Reach and Marcher Lords at least?

warsofasoiaf:

Thanks for the question, Anon.

The only House I can see ever used the title “High King of Dorne” was House Yronwood, that ruled the largest swath of land among the petty Dornish kings before Nymeria’s conquest (there was also a High King of Dorne by the Greenblood in ancient days, selected among a number of now-extinct houses, but considering that crown disintegrated prior to the Andal Invasion, I don’t think that style made much difference to anyone). I don’t think the reacher and marcher neighbors thought much of the style, to be honest; reacher and marcher lords have long been enemies of their Dornish neighbors (and vice versa), and if a Dornishman called himself “lord”, “high king”, or simply “ser”, his style wouldn’t change the mutual antagonism on that southern border. It would not have likely been in the interest of reachmen and men of the Dornish Marches to study the political makeup of Dorne; there could be a God-Emperor of Dorne, for all they cared, but Dornishmen were still in their minds cravens and liars and enemies. A man could call himself whatever he liked, but since there was little enough respect already held by marcher lords and reachmen for Dornish (and, if Anguy can be believed, by the Dornish for these people), a grander title would not, I think, have really affected the mindset of non-Dornish. Not that the style “high king” limited only to the Yronwoods anyway: after all, Robar II Royce had declared himself High King of the Vale after receiving the fealty of a number of petty First Men kings in his valiant but failed effort to drive back the Andals, and there had been at least 111 High Kings of the Iron Islands before Urron Greyiron made the office hereditary.

The Queen Regent (NFriel)

Actually, High King usually refers to a King who has other kings as vassals, but who hasn’t adopted the title of Emperor, usually because Emperors were believed to rule multiple nations whereas a High King ruled over one nation. So the Yronwoods having petty kings of Dorne as their vassals style themselves as High Kings of Dorne, and Robar II becomes High King of the Vale by having other First Men Kings of the Vale bend the knee. 

Had Aegon I not been so insistent that all of Westeros was one kingdom, he might have crowned himself Emperor of the Seven Kingdoms or possibly Emperor of the Andals, the First Men, and the Rhoynar; or if he’d decided to keep the various kings as kings instead of as Lords Paramount, he could have called himself High King of Westeros. 

A People’s History of the Marvel Universe, Week 5: Captain America vs. the 60s

Face front, true believers!

As I mentioned in Week 3, Marvel had a lot of work to do to
update Captain America for the 1960s. That was true enough for the early 60s,
when the U.S Army was the undisputed good guy in the comics, when Professor X
worked with the FBI to track down mutants (more on that in a future issue), and
when beatniks were an easy comedy bit. By 1968, when Captain America graduated
from Tales of Suspense (where he double-billed with Iron Man) and got his own
book, things had changed even more so. The comics industry had to deal with the
counter-culture’s influence on visual media (both through hiring a new
generation of writers and artists influenced by the counter-culture, but also
as older creators like Jack Kirby got interested in surrealism, mixed-media,
and other trends), and at the same time the counter-culture started to show an
interest in comics.

 And what was true for the industry
and Marvel as a whole was even more so for Captain America; as the
super-soldierly representation of all that’s best in
the U.S
, Cap had
to respond to changes in America’s political culture. So how did Cap face the
60s?

To begin with, by experimenting
artistically so that Cap’s image kept pace with the times. Jack Kirby continued
to draw giant robots and intricate machines, but he also pushed his art to
become ever more elaborate and strange – the Cosmic Cube allowed him to bring
in some of the cosmic weirdness that we associate more with his run on
Fantastic Four and MODOK (more on that in a future issue as well) continued his
interest in giant Olmec heads. In addition, Jim Steranko was brought in as a
regular artist and brought with him a new interest in psychedelic art and
surrealism, an emphasis on flowing and contorting movement, and experimental
paneling:

image

Counter-cultural art can only get
you so far when that art is depicting a man literally dressed as the American
flag in the midst of the Vietnam war (more on which in future installments). So
Stan Lee and Jack Kirby (and Jim Steranko, and so on) had to deal directly with
how Captain America was viewed by the new generation:

image

Between Captain America #120 and
#130, Steve Rogers is suddenly made aware of the generation gap, the
counter-culture, and that he himself is viewed as a giant square. But where
most people opining on Captain America go wrong is that Marvel didn’t have Cap
respond to this by becoming a reactionary, lashing out at the damned hippies.
Rather, Lee et al. leaned into their already-established trope as Cap as a man out of time in a different way, as Steve Rogers
takes the critique seriously:

image

This is how Captain America engages
in political analysis. Rather than writing off the baby boom generation, he
draws a direct link between the “injustice, greed, and endless war” that he has
observed in this new world and the rise of the “rebel and the dissenter,”
taking their complaints seriously. Moreover, as a good ally should, Steve
Rogers doesn’t stop at the structural level but also absorbs the
counter-cultural critique on a personal level, asking himself why he hasn’t
been more of an individualist and a dissenter rather than just a soldier.  

 On a meta-level, I think we can also
see this as a kind of generational reckoning as well, with Steve Rogers
standing in for the Marvel staff in their 40s who had spent their youth in the
U.S Army in WWII, confronting a new culture that valorized the “anti-hero”
rather than Marvel’s more straightforwardly earnest style of protagonist. Without
backing down on his insistence that the values he believes in are timeless and
that there is important things that his generation has to offer the youth – in
#122, Rogers will namedrop Martin Luther King Jr., JRR Tolkien, the Kennedy
brothers, and Marshall McLuhan as examples of “establishment” types who have
influenced the youth movement – Cap nonetheless starts to experiment with a
more counter-cultural way of life, suggesting that the counter-culture might be
right about his generation.

Not only will Captain America begin
questioning authority (usually in the form of Nick Fury of SHIELD) more, but
he’ll also take to the road on a motorcycle to carve out an identity as Steve
Rogers apart from the mantle of Captain America, setting up a big part of his
Easy Rider-inspired Nomad persona in the 1970s:

image

When Steve Rogers rides off into his
bike, looking for the Real America, he finds not just open road and existential
quandary but the radical student movement of the 1960s. And both Rogers himself
and his creators interact with the student movement much in the way that
mainstream liberals at the time did, sympathizing with student demands but
viewing radical direct action as dangerous and illiberal:

image
image

Thus, Steve Rogers in his civilian
guise goes into action to protect a professor from being kidnapped by dangerous
radicals, but also takes the campus administration to task for not listening to
their students. Meanwhile, Stan Lee and Gene Colan depict student radicals as
unrepresentative of their peers and threatening the destruction of the larger
institution. At the same time, however, when it comes down to a clash between
campus protestors and the police, we know which side Captain America will come
down on, and it’s not the police:

image

While this might not rise to the
level of Denny O’Neill on Green Lantern and Green Arrow, it’s still an
important symbolic statement. Despite how wildly unpopular the New Left had
made itself by the late 1960s (71% of Americans believed that the “country
would be better off if there was less protest and dissatisfaction coming from
college campuses” in 1968) here’s Captain America siding with the kids against
the cops – as we’ll see, an association that will be enduring across issues.

At the same time though, Marvel also finessed this potential controversy with
some rather strange symbolic politics. That long-haired, pink-panted gentleman
standing next to Mart Baker and the megaphone isn’t actually a bona-fide
student…he’s an undercover agent of AIM. AIM is secretly infiltrating the
student movement and deliberately intensifying conflict in order both to weaken
American society, but also as a cover for the abduction of various professors
in the sciences whose research AIM wants to steal:

image
image

If you strip out the inherent Marvel
wackiness of MODOK’s giant baby head and AIM’s beekeeper helmets, this isn’t
too different from contemporary conservative arguments that the student
movement had been infiltrated by Soviet agents. At the same time, though, Lee
and Colan frame the situation as AIM having seized upon “legitimate grievances”
and show the students as unwitting tools rather than actively disloyal, and
when AIM’s involvement is unmasked, Cap and student radicals team up to take
them down:

image

It’s hard to look at this particular
storyline and not see the whole thing as condescending at best, but Marvel
Comics didn’t leave it at that. Hot off the heels of his intervention in campus
politics, Steve Rogers gets approached to become the TV pitchman for a “law and
order” backlash against the New Left that’s hiding sinister motives:

image

And because he’s Captain America,
and Captain America’s secret super-power is weaponized morality, Cap sees right
through the slogans of “law and order” to the sinister plot of men wearing
white hoods over their faces (not hugely subtle symbolism there, but some anvils needed to be dropped in 1968):

image
image

This is what I mean when I say that
Captain America is a progressive: he’s reframing patriotism and American
national traditions as inherently radical and de-linking the defense of the
status quo from the defense of the values that the status quo supposedly
embodies, while taking a strong pro-non-violence line with regards to protest. It’s also Marvel re-defining Captain America as a dissident, as
someone who will fight for America’s ideals rather than America’s establishment
(which will eventually lead Captain America to go into the belly of the beast
and confront Richard Nixon directly, a topic for a future issue).

So in the 1960s, Captain America
becomes the defender of youth (in a future issue, I’ll discuss how Captain
America saved rock music by fighting the Hells Angels at Altamont). And it’s
just in the nick of time too, because as it turns out, the man in the white
hood pushing for “law and order” backlash politics is none other than actual,
factual Nazi, Baron Strucker of HYDRA:

image

So there you have it, folks. The
political movement behind Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan is secretly being run
by a Nazi cabal, MODOK is heightening the contradictions, and Cap says the kids
are all right. However, we really can’t talk about Ca in the 1960s without
talking about one Sam Wilson, better known as the Falcon, which we will tackle
the next time A People’s History of the Marvel Universe covers Captain America…

WarsofASOIAF Asks: A Successful Aegon V Reformation

Couple days back I was asked a question about how an Aegon V reformation would go down. Let’s say you’re the Hand of Aegon V. The Fortunate King has been able to successfully get all four of his marriages to go off without a hitch. I’m sure some form of your EDP’s will make their way into it, but what sort of acts would you do to reform and restructure the government for the sake of the smallfolk?

Cheers,

-SLAL

As I talked about a while back, it’s very hard to know what Aegon’s reforms consist of, because GRRM is very unspecific about them and because a lot depends on what precisely is the legal status of westerosi smallfolk.

But if I had to guess, I would say that there probably would be a lot of legal reforms – royal judges and sheriffs, eliminating the right of pit and gallows, the right to a jury, etc. – given the lawlessness of the period (especially in the Westerlands), Egg’s experience with local conflicts between nobles in the Reach, and so on.

Given that he gave food to the North during winter (which may also have been prompted to his trip to Winterfell), I think he was definitely focused on charity during natural disasters and the like.

But beyond that, I don’t know. 

In order for Dany to succeed, would she need to completely eradicate the master classes of Slaver’s Bay, or is there a more peaceful option?

Generally speaking, there’s really only two ways to prevent a revolution like Dany’s from going backwards – eliminate the population of the master class or eliminate what makes them a master class. 

The former involves a lot of revolutionary violence and/or exile. Deeply morally problematic, certainly, but a big part of Machiavelli’s chapter on cruelty in the Prince is an argument that it’s better to do it all at once, rather than leave things undone and deal with years and years of insurrectionary violence and reprisal-killing that will either bring down the new regime or require an incredibly heavy hand to put down, leading to more overall violence. 

The latter is much, much harder to pull off, because it means keeping alive a class that has an existential impulse to pull down the new order, and it requires a thorough power analysis – in other words, what made the master class the master class, and what would the newly-overthrown class need to get back on top, and how can we confiscate and redistribute the former while preventing them from getting their hands on the latter? And the reason why this is hard to pull off is that if you miss one element that gives the former masters a foundation to build power from, they’ll come roaring back with a vengeance. 

Let’s take Slaver’s Bay for an example. 

Astapor, Yunkai, and Meereen were slave societies, and particularly intense ones at that. Numbers were not what was keeping the Good/Wise/Great Masters in power – they are in fact outnumbered about 6:1. This is an advantage for a new regime, because the supermajority of ex-slaves itself can help keep the ex-masters in check. But since that ratio obtained back during the old regime, numbers alone aren’t sufficient.

So what did the master classes have that kept them in power? 

  • Firstly, a monopoly on violence, which they used with abandon to put the slave population in a state of terror – Astapor especially is a comprehensive example of how you use conspicuous exemplary punishment to instill fear in a population. Likewise, you look at how the Sons of the Harpy operated in Meereen and how the Yunkish put down the new regime in Astapor, and it’s pretty clear that the Masters really prefer this method of control to any other. 
  • Secondly, a monopoly on the means of production. Now, in the old regime this meant control on the slave training system that was the basis for much of the economy in Slaver’s Bay. However, as we see in Dany I of ADWD, it also crucially meant control over farmland, pasturage, mines, workshops and machinery, and shipping – the building blocks of a post-slavery economy. 
  • Thirdly, a monopoly on capital. This refers primarily to liquid capital, which is especially important when you consider how the Yunkish use their cash to hire mercenaries and bribe the Volantines into intervening.

So the question before us is how should Dany have dealt with these factors when embarking on her crusade? 

Violence:

Here, Dany made some good moves initially. Liberating the Unsullied of Astapor reduced the Good Masters to a few dozen inexperienced cavalrymen. Destroying the Yunkish army of slave infantry and mercenaries left the Wise Masters unable to resist any of Dany’s demands. Similarly, her decision in Meereen to mobilize the ex-slaves into the Brazen Beasts, the Mother’s Men, the Stalwart Shields, and the Free Brothers is a good one, in that it allows the freedmen to potentially defend themselves rather than relying entirely on Dany’s own forces and especially her dragons.

However, Dany made some significant mistakes along the way, as I discussed in my Laboratory of Politics essay and on my tumblr. In Astapor, she pulled out all of the Unsullied, meaning that the new government had no military to defend itself with from usurpers. In Yunkai, she left the Wise Masters in place while removing tens of thousands of ex-slaves from the city, allowing the new regime to re-arm itself without interference at home. In Meereen, while the city is sacked, the pyramids of the Great Masters are untouched and the former military elite are able to hide underneath Dany’s amnesty to form the hard core of the Sons of the Harpy. Similarly, the ex-masters were seemingly not disarmed following the Siege, allowing them to strike at both civilians and isolated soldiers. 

What Dany should have done was to leave a decent-sized garrison in Astapor and Yunkai to support the new government in both Astapor and Yunkai, which she should never have left in the hands of the Wise Masters. These Unsullied could have also provided training to the men of military age who would have joined the Mother’s Men, Stalwart Shields, and Free Brothers, providing those cities with a more substantial defensive force. Moreover, with the garrisons giving more security to the regime, it’s more likely that the tens of thousands of refugees who followed Dany, complicating supply issues, spreading disease, and eliminating the land route to Volantis would have stayed home.

Means of Production:

This is much more of a mixed bag. While the destruction of the ruling class of Astapor gave the ex-slaves control of the entire city’s resources, Dany’s decision to have the Yunkish only a limited reparation of “a weapon, and as much food, clothing, coin, and goods as he or she can carry” guaranteed that the ex-slaves who followed her would be starving refugees in short order. In Meereen, while a few ex-slaves with skills were able to set themselves up as weavers or prostitutes, her decision to allow the Great Masters to live and retain all their property meant that “they had freed their slaves, yes … only to hire them back as servants at wages so meagre that most could scarce afford to eat.“ 

At the same time, with no way of supporting themselves independently, tens of thousands of ex-slaves were thrown onto a buyer’s labor market, driving down wages and creating such a degree of economic insecurity that ex-slaves with human capital turn to selling themselves back into slavery, which symbolically threatens Dany’s revolution even if the majority of ex-slaves remain free. 

What Dany needed to do in both Yunkai and Meereen is to expropriate the workshops, farms, and urban real estate of the former masters and distribute it to the former slaves, so that the freedmen have a baseline of economic security and have an alternative to throwing themselves on the labor market for whatever wages are going as a means of survival, and so that the former masters can’t use their economic power to coerce the ex-slaves and non-slave-holding free people into subservience or use those assets against Dany personally (in the case of Meereen’s navy). In addition, giving the former slaves workshops and farms gives them a very personal and active stake in the survival of the new order – as we see with Rylona Rhee, slaves who have economic independence get active politically, forming the leadership of a new political class. 

Capital:

As I’ve suggested above, control over access to liquid capital is very important, both because the ex-masters are going to use their cash to hire mercenaries, bribe Volantines, and entice non-slaveholders into joining the Sons of the Harpy, and because Dany badly needs that liquid capital to create a new economic order that doesn’t rely on the training and selling of slaves.

Yes, it’s true that Slaver’s Bay doesn’t have a huge amount of currently exploitable resources to build an economy on – copper being less valuable in a post-iron era, the Great Master’s damaging scorched-earth strategy, etc. But one of the things you can buy with money are saplings to plant in place of the vanished cedars and the burnt olive groves, tools and labor and materials to improve irrigation systems so that the hinterlands can make the cities more self-sufficient for food, equipment and labor to expand salt and copper mining and prospect for other minerals, ships to compete in non-slave based commerce, and so on.

More importantly, getting that cash out of the masters’ hands – as Dany belatedly does when she imposes the blood tax – means that they don’t have the resources to hire mercenaries, bribe anyone, or recruit Sons of the Harpy. 

Conclusion

In addition to all of this, we can’t neglect the importance of the symbolic. A big part of the reason why the Masters were able to hold such sway over their cities was that they could afford display of power and importance – hence the tokar, the crazy hair, and so on and so forth. While the Masters lost most of their human wealth with Dany’s revolution, they still had the money and the property with which to undergird their public image.

But take all of that away from them, reduce them to the level of just another ordinary citizen who has to work for a living, and you eliminate the mystique. Non only does the ex-slave not have to knuckle under to them to live, but the ex-non-slaveowner has no reason to show them political or social or cultural deference. Rather than being the one-and-former rulers revenging themselves on the occupier, they’re a bunch of impotent dead-enders. 

In that circumstance, Shavepate’s cultural revolution seems like the better bet – whether that’s a position in the Brazen Beasts, a job working in Dany’s palace, a seat on the ruling council, etc.

Chapter-by-Chapter Analysis: Tyrion XIII, ACOK

Chapter-by-Chapter Analysis: Tyrion XIII, ACOK

image
“They say I’m half a man…what does that make the lot of you?” Synopsis: Tyrion observes his works and doesn’t quite despair before rushing off to the defense of the King’s Gate, where Sandor is refusing to lead another sortie against Stannis’ landing parties. Tyrion steps into the breach. SPOILER WARNING: This chapter analysis, and all following, will contain spoilers for all Song of Ice and Fire…

View On WordPress