She was a widow, a traitor, a grieving mother, and wise, wise in the ways of the world. Synopsis: Catelyn is put under house arrest at her own urging, comes to a realization about her father, gets some news about Robb, and gets into a fight with Edmure. All happy families are alike; each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way… SPOILER WARNING: This chapter analysis, and all following, will…
It’s absolutely realistic – the Renaissance as an intellectual and cultural and economic movement overlapped with what we think of as the Late Medieval Age, which ran from 1301 to 1500. Michelangelo was 12 when the Wars of the Roses ended; Leonardo da Vinci was born two years before they started (and a year before the Hundred Years War ended) and outlived them.
Edward III fought the battles of Crecy and Poiters with gold borrowed from the Bardi and the Peruzzi bankers of Florence, and his failure to repay in 1345 was one of the reasons why, a generation later, Contessina de Bardi married Cosimo de Medici, who used her family’s reputation to help make himself Florence’s “king in all but name.”
“He remembered the pail Lady Catelyn had kicked over in his cell. A strange woman, to trust her girls to a man with shit for honor.” Synopsis: Brienne takes Jaime and Ser Cleos down the river, where they are almost caught by Ser Robin Ryger. SPOILER WARNING: This chapter analysis, and all following, will contain spoilers for all Song of Ice and Fire novels and Game of Thrones episodes. Caveat…
Well, you have to keep in mind that most pre-modern societies had very very small financial sectors, and involved far fewer people. So it was harder to operate anonymously in those sectors. Also, pre-modern financiers tended to be much more conservative in terms of who they loaned to, the terms they would lend at, etc.
A good deal of fraud and embezzlement actually took place in the core agricultural sector, however. Fudging the accounts, making sick animals look healthy and vice versa, adulterating quality of products so that you can skim off the top, literally putting your thumb on the scales when it came to weighing goods, etc.
So how did they deal with it? Well, because of the centrality of agriculture, there was a pretty sophisticated system of food inspection, and fraudulent bakers and other vendors were publicly humiliated by dragging them around the streets (either on a sled or hurdle, which added a measure of public humiliation) with their adulterated goods hanging around their neck, so that the consuming public knew who not to frequent. The pillory was frequently used to punish commercial fraud, as both a method of informing the public and as an outsourcing of physical punishment to the crowd.
And those were relatively light punishments for financial crimes – if you were caught committing forgery, the penalty was death by either boiling oil or by having molten metal poured down your throat. In England, after 1278, stealing over four pence worth of goods was punished with the hangman’s noose. And so on and so forth.
“The snow’s taken it all from me…the bloody snow….”
Synopsis: Chett has a terrible, no good, very bad day. Which makes me happy.
SPOILER WARNING: This chapter analysis, and all following, will contain spoilers for all Song of Ice and Fire novels and Game of Thrones episodes. Caveat lector.
(more…)
“Poor man wanna be rich, Rich man wanna be king, And a king ain’t satisfied, ‘til he rules everything.”
To take your Boleyn example, the Boleyns weren’t actually all that rich and powerful. Thomas Boleyn, Anne’s father, was the son of a wealthy mercer who had bought himself a knighthood and a marriage to a Butler of Ireland. That still made him relatively low-ranking, a mere knight and diplomat, despite his incredibly fortunate marriage to a Howard. But through Anne, Thomas became Viscount Rochford, Earl of Wiltshire, and Lord Privy Seal. So for the upwardly mobile, politics offered an opportunity to join the true elite.
For those already there, there’s always more to get. The Kingmaker was born the son of the Earl of Salisbury, but marrying Anne Beauchamp got him the Despenser fortune and through some rather complicated legal maneuverings, the Earldom of Warwick, which was to be the foundation of his empire. The Kingmaker sided with the Duke of York in part because Somerset (the leading Lancastrian) had taken the Lordship of Glamorgan, which had been part of the Despenser legacy. Siding with the Duke of York got him the position of Constable of Calais, and siding with Edward IV got him the Admiralty of England, the Stewardship of the Duchy of Lancaster, his brother got made Warden of the East March and Earl of Northumberland, and his other brother got the Archbishopric of York and the Chancellory of England.
But there’s also the fact that in feudal politics, most of the time, everything belongs to someone. So a lot of people stayed in the game to avoid losing what they already had – the losers in a civil war, or even the people who weren’t friendly enough with the regime, could lose Dukeships, Earldoms, and Baronies aplenty.
“His wits were coming back to him, however slowly. That was good. His wits were all he had.”
Synopsis: Tyrion wakes up to find he’s lost his nose, his job, and the credit for his victory.
SPOILER WARNING: This chapter analysis, and all following, will contain spoilers for all Song of Ice and Fire novels and Game of Thrones episodes. Caveat lector.
(more…)
“If I die, I die friendless and abandoned. What choice did that leave him, but to live?”
Synopsis: Theon “wins” the Siege of Winterfell. And loses at life.
SPOILER WARNING: This chapter analysis, and all following, will contain spoilers for all Song of Ice and Fire novels and Game of Thrones episodes. Caveat lector.
(more…)
The only House I can see ever used the title “High King of Dorne” was House Yronwood, that ruled the largest swath of land among the petty Dornish kings before Nymeria’s conquest (there was also a High King of Dorne by the Greenblood in ancient days, selected among a number of now-extinct houses, but considering that crown disintegrated prior to the Andal Invasion, I don’t think that style made much difference to anyone). I don’t think the reacher and marcher neighbors thought much of the style, to be honest; reacher and marcher lords have long been enemies of their Dornish neighbors (and vice versa), and if a Dornishman called himself “lord”, “high king”, or simply “ser”, his style wouldn’t change the mutual antagonism on that southern border. It would not have likely been in the interest of reachmen and men of the Dornish Marches to study the political makeup of Dorne; there could be a God-Emperor of Dorne, for all they cared, but Dornishmen were still in their minds cravens and liars and enemies. A man could call himself whatever he liked, but since there was little enough respect already held by marcher lords and reachmen for Dornish (and, if Anguy can be believed, by the Dornish for these people), a grander title would not, I think, have really affected the mindset of non-Dornish. Not that the style “high king” limited only to the Yronwoods anyway: after all, Robar II Royce had declared himself High King of the Vale after receiving the fealty of a number of petty First Men kings in his valiant but failed effort to drive back the Andals, and there had been at least 111 High Kings of the Iron Islands before Urron Greyiron made the office hereditary.
The Queen Regent (NFriel)
Actually, High King usually refers to a King who has other kings as vassals, but who hasn’t adopted the title of Emperor, usually because Emperors were believed to rule multiple nations whereas a High King ruled over one nation. So the Yronwoods having petty kings of Dorne as their vassals style themselves as High Kings of Dorne, and Robar II becomes High King of the Vale by having other First Men Kings of the Vale bend the knee.
Had Aegon I not been so insistent that all of Westeros was one kingdom, he might have crowned himself Emperor of the Seven Kingdoms or possibly Emperor of the Andals, the First Men, and the Rhoynar; or if he’d decided to keep the various kings as kings instead of as Lords Paramount, he could have called himself High King of Westeros.
As I mentioned in Week 3, Marvel had a lot of work to do to
update Captain America for the 1960s. That was true enough for the early 60s,
when the U.S Army was the undisputed good guy in the comics, when Professor X
worked with the FBI to track down mutants (more on that in a future issue), and
when beatniks were an easy comedy bit. By 1968, when Captain America graduated
from Tales of Suspense (where he double-billed with Iron Man) and got his own
book, things had changed even more so. The comics industry had to deal with the
counter-culture’s influence on visual media (both through hiring a new
generation of writers and artists influenced by the counter-culture, but also
as older creators like Jack Kirby got interested in surrealism, mixed-media,
and other trends), and at the same time the counter-culture started to show an
interest in comics.
And what was true for the industry
and Marvel as a whole was even more so for Captain America; as the
super-soldierly representation of all that’s best in
the U.S, Cap had
to respond to changes in America’s political culture. So how did Cap face the
60s?
To begin with, by experimenting
artistically so that Cap’s image kept pace with the times. Jack Kirby continued
to draw giant robots and intricate machines, but he also pushed his art to
become ever more elaborate and strange – the Cosmic Cube allowed him to bring
in some of the cosmic weirdness that we associate more with his run on
Fantastic Four and MODOK (more on that in a future issue as well) continued his
interest in giant Olmec heads. In addition, Jim Steranko was brought in as a
regular artist and brought with him a new interest in psychedelic art and
surrealism, an emphasis on flowing and contorting movement, and experimental
paneling:
Counter-cultural art can only get
you so far when that art is depicting a man literally dressed as the American
flag in the midst of the Vietnam war (more on which in future installments). So
Stan Lee and Jack Kirby (and Jim Steranko, and so on) had to deal directly with
how Captain America was viewed by the new generation:
Between Captain America #120 and
#130, Steve Rogers is suddenly made aware of the generation gap, the
counter-culture, and that he himself is viewed as a giant square. But where
most people opining on Captain America go wrong is that Marvel didn’t have Cap
respond to this by becoming a reactionary, lashing out at the damned hippies.
Rather, Lee et al. leaned into their already-established trope as Cap as a man out of time in a different way, as Steve Rogers
takes the critique seriously:
This is how Captain America engages
in political analysis. Rather than writing off the baby boom generation, he
draws a direct link between the “injustice, greed, and endless war” that he has
observed in this new world and the rise of the “rebel and the dissenter,”
taking their complaints seriously. Moreover, as a good ally should, Steve
Rogers doesn’t stop at the structural level but also absorbs the
counter-cultural critique on a personal level, asking himself why he hasn’t
been more of an individualist and a dissenter rather than just a soldier.
On a meta-level, I think we can also
see this as a kind of generational reckoning as well, with Steve Rogers
standing in for the Marvel staff in their 40s who had spent their youth in the
U.S Army in WWII, confronting a new culture that valorized the “anti-hero”
rather than Marvel’s more straightforwardly earnest style of protagonist. Without
backing down on his insistence that the values he believes in are timeless and
that there is important things that his generation has to offer the youth – in
#122, Rogers will namedrop Martin Luther King Jr., JRR Tolkien, the Kennedy
brothers, and Marshall McLuhan as examples of “establishment” types who have
influenced the youth movement – Cap nonetheless starts to experiment with a
more counter-cultural way of life, suggesting that the counter-culture might be
right about his generation.
Not only will Captain America begin
questioning authority (usually in the form of Nick Fury of SHIELD) more, but
he’ll also take to the road on a motorcycle to carve out an identity as Steve
Rogers apart from the mantle of Captain America, setting up a big part of his
Easy Rider-inspired Nomad persona in the 1970s:
When Steve Rogers rides off into his
bike, looking for the Real America, he finds not just open road and existential
quandary but the radical student movement of the 1960s. And both Rogers himself
and his creators interact with the student movement much in the way that
mainstream liberals at the time did, sympathizing with student demands but
viewing radical direct action as dangerous and illiberal:
Thus, Steve Rogers in his civilian
guise goes into action to protect a professor from being kidnapped by dangerous
radicals, but also takes the campus administration to task for not listening to
their students. Meanwhile, Stan Lee and Gene Colan depict student radicals as
unrepresentative of their peers and threatening the destruction of the larger
institution. At the same time, however, when it comes down to a clash between
campus protestors and the police, we know which side Captain America will come
down on, and it’s not the police:
While this might not rise to the
level of Denny O’Neill on Green Lantern and Green Arrow, it’s still an
important symbolic statement. Despite how wildly unpopular the New Left had
made itself by the late 1960s (71% of Americans believed that the “country
would be better off if there was less protest and dissatisfaction coming from
college campuses” in 1968) here’s Captain America siding with the kids against
the cops – as we’ll see, an association that will be enduring across issues.
At the same time though, Marvel also finessed this potential controversy with
some rather strange symbolic politics. That long-haired, pink-panted gentleman
standing next to Mart Baker and the megaphone isn’t actually a bona-fide
student…he’s an undercover agent of AIM. AIM is secretly infiltrating the
student movement and deliberately intensifying conflict in order both to weaken
American society, but also as a cover for the abduction of various professors
in the sciences whose research AIM wants to steal:
If you strip out the inherent Marvel
wackiness of MODOK’s giant baby head and AIM’s beekeeper helmets, this isn’t
too different from contemporary conservative arguments that the student
movement had been infiltrated by Soviet agents. At the same time, though, Lee
and Colan frame the situation as AIM having seized upon “legitimate grievances”
and show the students as unwitting tools rather than actively disloyal, and
when AIM’s involvement is unmasked, Cap and student radicals team up to take
them down:
It’s hard to look at this particular
storyline and not see the whole thing as condescending at best, but Marvel
Comics didn’t leave it at that. Hot off the heels of his intervention in campus
politics, Steve Rogers gets approached to become the TV pitchman for a “law and
order” backlash against the New Left that’s hiding sinister motives:
And because he’s Captain America,
and Captain America’s secret super-power is weaponized morality, Cap sees right
through the slogans of “law and order” to the sinister plot of men wearing
white hoods over their faces (not hugely subtle symbolism there, but some anvils needed to be dropped in 1968):
This is what I mean when I say that
Captain America is a progressive: he’s reframing patriotism and American
national traditions as inherently radical and de-linking the defense of the
status quo from the defense of the values that the status quo supposedly
embodies, while taking a strong pro-non-violence line with regards to protest. It’s also Marvel re-defining Captain America as a dissident, as
someone who will fight for America’s ideals rather than America’s establishment
(which will eventually lead Captain America to go into the belly of the beast
and confront Richard Nixon directly, a topic for a future issue).
So in the 1960s, Captain America
becomes the defender of youth (in a future issue, I’ll discuss how Captain
America saved rock music by fighting the Hells Angels at Altamont). And it’s
just in the nick of time too, because as it turns out, the man in the white
hood pushing for “law and order” backlash politics is none other than actual,
factual Nazi, Baron Strucker of HYDRA:
So there you have it, folks. The
political movement behind Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan is secretly being run
by a Nazi cabal, MODOK is heightening the contradictions, and Cap says the kids
are all right. However, we really can’t talk about Ca in the 1960s without
talking about one Sam Wilson, better known as the Falcon, which we will tackle
the next time A People’s History of the Marvel Universe covers Captain America…