In your Laboratory of Politics series, you say that “Essos and Westeros were unrealistically uninvolved in the other’s political conflicts”. What involvements did you have in mind?

Well, keep in mind that I wrote that before the World of Ice and Fire came out.

But, using historical interactions between the British Isles and the European continent, it is quite surprising that we only got First Men, Andal, and Rhoynar migrations to Westeros, or that Targaryen kings mostly stayed out of Essosi politics (seriously, not one of that crazy bunch tried to rebuild the Valyrian Empire? Moreover, after Aegon the Conqueror, the importance of a balance of power on the continent seems to disappear as a foreign policy objective), or that outside of the Triarchy and the Rogares there seems to be little Essosi involvement in Westerosi politics (especially during the various civil wars). I’m certainly a bit surprised that there aren’t more Essosi merchants and artisans living in King’s Landing or the other major cities. 

Inspired by Maester Steven Attewell: I love what Neil Marshall did with limited budget and time in GoT “Blackwater”, but let’s say we have all the budget and time we want for a full-scale Battle of the Blackwater full-on ACOK crazy. Enough time for characters and setup, detailed battlefield reconstruction, Stannis on the south bank, his fleet sailing in, Sandor’s sorties, the wildfire, the boom chain, Tyrion’s sortie, the bridge of burning ships, you name it. Who to direct? George Miller?

poorquentyn:

racefortheironthrone:

poorquentyn:

Bong Joon-Ho, director of (among others) The Host and Snowpiercer. Best action director working, other than his idol Spielberg, of course. 

As long as we’re being completely hypothetical, I’d love to see Kurosawa do it. 

Hot damn, yes please. Mifune playing Tyrion or Davos? 

Could work as either. 

Inspired by Maester Steven Attewell: I love what Neil Marshall did with limited budget and time in GoT “Blackwater”, but let’s say we have all the budget and time we want for a full-scale Battle of the Blackwater full-on ACOK crazy. Enough time for characters and setup, detailed battlefield reconstruction, Stannis on the south bank, his fleet sailing in, Sandor’s sorties, the wildfire, the boom chain, Tyrion’s sortie, the bridge of burning ships, you name it. Who to direct? George Miller?

poorquentyn:

Bong Joon-Ho, director of (among others) The Host and Snowpiercer. Best action director working, other than his idol Spielberg, of course. 

As long as we’re being completely hypothetical, I’d love to see Kurosawa do it. 

Simon Rumble Asks: Taxes vs Law

I am currently participating in an online course that discusses war and its relationship with society. The instructor asserted that the ability to collect taxes efficiently is the best indicator of a strong centralized authority. You have discussed the power of the law and how monarchs in ASOIAF and real life have used the law to strengthen the central authority. 

Don’t both depend on the authority having a monopoly on violence? Your thoughts?

Well, monopoly on violence might also depend on your ability to collect taxes efficiently, in so far as much as a standing army needs to be paid regularly. So both factors move in the same direction – if your tax system breaks down, it becomes harder to keep armies in the fall; if tax receipts are up, the quality and quantity of soldiers in your army improve. 

Now, judicial power ultimately does require a monopoly on violence, in the sense that if someone refuses to surrender to the constables, that’s a challenge to royal authority that ultimately has to be answered with soldiers. But it’s also a means of legitimizing and helping to establish monopolies on violence – enforcing the law against powerful noblemen who might otherwise challenge your rule is a good way to head those challenges off before they become rebellions, etc. 

Where did each part of a medieval army come from? Specifically, I was wondering if cavalry was drawn solely from nobility due to the expenses involved or if commoners could be included too. Thank you!

As with everything having to do with the Middle Ages, the answer is it depends on when and where you’re talking about. Generally speaking, the later in the Middle Ages you get, the higher the proportion of professional soldiers who weren’t knights serving as men-at-arms.

Stefan Sasse: As a follow-up to the question you got about your career path, you mentioned all those different historic areas you studied. In Germany, you usually don’t diversify that much, especially since the prevailing wisom is that you need to speak the language to the history (and who ever does?). So, how do you approach source texts and the like in the US?

Well, keep in mind I was talking about taking undergraduate-level courses; standards are different at the masters or PhD level, where there are language requirements. As someone studying the U.S, I had an easier job of it just having to prove proficiency in French (even though you don’t really need French to study 20th century U.S public policy); a medievalist, for example, would have to prove proficiency in French, medieval French, Latin and/or Greek, and paleography. 

But in general, for undergraduate and intro-level graduate courses, primary documents would be read in translation. For higher-level grad courses, you’d be expected to read in the language.