Maybe. Certainly there are squishers in that neck of the woods.
Category: Uncategorized
Do you think the number of small council members would have been the same, if there was a Royal Bank, or a royal justice system, or a permanent parliament-like Great Council? Or would they have fallen under the responsibilities of the Master of Coin and Master of Laws? What should an effective small council be composed of, in your opinion?
Well, if there was a royal justice system, you’d just have circuit justices reporting to the Master of Laws who reports to the King.
If there was a royal Bank, they’d probably report to the Master of Coin.
But if there’s a Great Council, you’re going to need some sort of Chancellor/Speaker/liaison figure.
In terms of missing positions:
- Master of Agriculture: given the seasons, maximizing agricultural production, minimizing spoilage, and maximizing storage is a national necessity.
- Master of Roads (and bridges, canals, mills, etc.): Westeros desperately needs improvements to its infrastructure to help drive economic development.
Maester Steven, may I please ask what your favourite passage or quote from Shakespeare is? (my own knowledge of The Bard is broad, rather than deep, but to date my own favourite has to be “O! For a Muse of Fire…” with it’s evocation of the creative process and invocation of the Player’s magic that took the Groundlings out from the Globe into all the World, Known and Unknown – a fondness for which I hold Sir Derek Jacobi directly responsible!).
It’s hard to pick one, but I’ve always loved Lear the best:
Poor naked wretches, wheresoe’er you are,
That bide the pelting of this pitiless storm,
How shall your houseless heads and unfed sides,
Your loop’d and window’d raggedness, defend you
From seasons such as these? O, I have ta’en
Too little care of this! Take physic, pomp;
Expose thyself to feel what wretches feel,
That thou mayst shake the superflux to them,
And show the heavens more just.
How accurate do you find the YouTube video entitled “The wars that inspired Game of Thrones – Alex Gendler” to be?
Pretty much, although there are some alternative interpretations.
As the Crown how would you deal with the Faith Militant?
Don’t let them re-arm.
To piggyback off of the last ask you answered: in TWOIAF, Loron Greyjoy (the Bard) is described as having a “great and tragic friendship” with Desmond Mallister. Given that this is GRRM, and he tends to be a bit of a tragic romantic himself, do you think this is meant to imply that this was a romantic relationship between the two of them?
Could well be, or it could be a Fox and the Hound thing.
Does the faith consider homosexuality a sin or is that so!ething the show made up?
It seems to be a show-only thing. After all, there have been a number of very prominent LGBT figures in the history of Westeros – Laenor Velaryon, Prince Daeron, Daemon II, etc. – and you’d think that if it was as significant a sin as it is on the show, it would have come up when these figures were potential candidates for the Iron Throne.
However, there doesn’t seem to be widespread social acceptance either, given that (for example) the majority of the LGBT characters we encounter get married to people not of their sexual orientation, although this seems as much (if not more) about pulling their weight in their family by producing heirs and making dynastic alliances as it does about remaining closeted.
Indeed, if we can take Cersei’s ruminations about Renly as any metric, rather than seeing sexuality as something set in stone, it seems to be described as a general preference but not an exclusive one: “a man may prefer the taste of hippocras, yet if you set a tankard of ale before him, he will quaff it quick enough.”
Do we have any idea how this plays out among the smallfolk? All of the examples of gay westerosi that I can think of are highborn, which might give them the freedom to be a little more open about it, especially since dynastic marriages and children are expected regardless of your romantic preferences.
Satin, for instance (who may not, of course, be gay) gets disrespected a fair amount at the Wall. It certainly seem possible that the social stigma around homosexuality is a much bigger deal without the privilege of social class. Moreover, it seems as though The Faith of The Seven, with its well defined gender roles, is a lot more militant among the lower classes of Westeros, which could add to the social stigma of LGBT Westerosi smallfolk.
Speaking of which, lesbians seem a lot thinner on the ground in Westeros than gay men. presumably this indicates some additional social stigma? I’d suggest that it’s similar to the class issue, another kind of privilege that men have that is denied to women.
Gay smallfolk…hmmm. Well, I think Varys and Illyrio were ex-lovers, but neither of them are Westerosi. In terms of smallfolk attitudes, no one at the Wall seems to bat an eye at Alf of Runnymudd and Garth, altho some are disrespectful of Satin. This might be a hypocrisy angle common to many societies – that the older, presumed top, partner is acceptably manly, whereas the younger, presumed bottom, partner is seen as having taken on the feminine role and is scorned not so much for having sex with men but being too femme. (See George Chauncey’s Gay New York for how this viewpoint continued through the early 20th century)
As for lesbianism, I think this is a weird offshoot of patriarchy, namely that women’s sexual desire isn’t deemed as something important (as long as it’s not screwing with male line of descent). Hence the Bible doesn’t mention female-female sex while it does discuss male-male sex, hence Japanese texts from the Medieval period through to the 18th century having a well-worked out typology for male sexuality while largely ignoring female sexuality outside of the male context.
So to go back to Westeros, no one blinks an eye at the idea that highborn women might have their handmaidens sleeping in the same bed (whereas they’d freak out at the idea of an unmarried highborn women sleeping in the same bed as a man), and neither Cersei nor Dany seem to have any conception of any taboo existing when they have sex with women. And if we take Lady Sabitha Frey nee Vypren, the fact that she was “fond of…kissing women” seems to have been treated as a kind of outgrowth of her performing other aspects of masculinity like wearing armor, riding horses, and fighting in battle.
Does the faith consider homosexuality a sin or is that so!ething the show made up?
It seems to be a show-only thing. After all, there have been a number of very prominent LGBT figures in the history of Westeros – Laenor Velaryon, Prince Daeron, Daemon II, etc. – and you’d think that if it was as significant a sin as it is on the show, it would have come up when these figures were potential candidates for the Iron Throne.
However, there doesn’t seem to be widespread social acceptance either, given that (for example) the majority of the LGBT characters we encounter get married to people not of their sexual orientation, although this seems as much (if not more) about pulling their weight in their family by producing heirs and making dynastic alliances as it does about remaining closeted.
Indeed, if we can take Cersei’s ruminations about Renly as any metric, rather than seeing sexuality as something set in stone, it seems to be described as a general preference but not an exclusive one: “a man may prefer the taste of hippocras, yet if you set a tankard of ale before him, he will quaff it quick enough.”
Where does a legitimized bastard fall in the line of succession? Like, if Jon Snow was legitimized as Ned’s son, where would he fall in the line to inherit Winterfell (so without any knowledge of him being a Targaryen)
Depends if we’re following Targaryen rules (which after the Blackfyre Rebellions put legitimized bastards dead last, even after women) or not. If not, Jon would have a fairly good claim as the oldest surviving “son.” If so, Jon comes after Sansa and Arya.
Do you think the Crown (in any era) would consider partitioning a region between loyal houses after the rebellion of a Great House in order to gradually diminish the Great House system and their hold on the 8 regions? For example, Stannis could split the Westerlands into different subregions instead of just naming another house in control of the Westerlands he could split it into five subregions or something
Maybe, but I doubt it. It’s possible that partitioning would allow for divide and rule, but that will lead to a lot of direct governance from King’s Landing, and I’m not sure that the Iron Throne has the capacity to do that.
So the danger is that in trying to keep the Westerlands down, you’re creating only a “hollow strength” that will vanish once one house eventually reunites the others. Because the problem is that there aren’t much in the way of natural borders inside the Westerlands, so you’re going to get a lot of fighting over territory, and chances are someone will win.