No.
Category: Uncategorized
Does the intensity of the Reach/Dorne rivalry vary throughout each kingdom? I would imagine the border lords have the most hatred, but then again, Arys Oakheart talked about his family killing Dornishmen even though they’re not anywhere near the Marches. So what about the Redwynes or the Florents or Rowans, etc?
That’s an interesting question – certainly I would imagine the marcher lords care most of all, since they’re the ones who have to deal with raiding on a regular basis. And I would imagine that distance plays a factor – so the Rowans, Cranes, Fossoways, and the other lords of the northern plains would be more focused on the Westerlands or the Stormlands.
But as you said wrt to the Oakhearts, given the frequent wars between the Reach and Dorne, and indeed between the Stormlands and Dorne, I imagine there’s a good number of houses who have fought enough wars to have a personal stake in the matter. Entire armies don’t vanish in the deserts without thousands of families being affected.
Is it possible for the Lord Paramount of Stormlands to organize a sellsword company of Stormlanders, sending them to fight in Essos and sending back home the payment ? Like how Frederick I of Prussia is known as the Mercenary King.
Possible, certainly. We’ve seen kingdom-based mercenary companies before – the Company of the Rose, the Stormbreakers (most likely named after the Durrandon knight of the same name).
Are there clues in the text as to what House Peake’s sigil was before they grabbed two additional castles?
Nope. But I’m going to guess a castle on a mountain.
@goodqueenaly, any thoughts?
Maester Steven, would I be correct in deducing that the Most Devout Durran is the son of an inconvenient second marriage given to The Faith in order to forestal a Storm of Scions? (It seemed odd to me that the YOUNGER son of a Storm King would be given the name Durran – given its numinous significance – so this is my No-Prize explanation for such a peculiarity).
No, I was just making a joke about the Durrandons being very unimaginative about names. So here we had a family of Durran Sr, Durran Jr, and Most Devout Durran.
Starbuck Adaptation
Regarding the Starbuck Chronicles, did you hear they’re being made into a TV series?
What Civil War books would you suggest be adapted?
I hadn’t heard that, but in a world in which Confederates is being made, nothing surprises me. It fits the trend after all.
As to what I’d suggest…anything that accurately portrays the Unionist or Emancipationist interpretations of the war would be a nice change of pace.
I’m sorry if this comes across as stupid but I’m very new to tumblr and very new to reading theories. But I find it interesting that Maekar’s reign is virtually unknown despite Viserys II and Jaehaerys II very short reigns, and we know more about them. I’m thinking it’s because GRRM is planning on bringing him more in D&E tales as the reason?
I don’t think it’s stupid at all.
Maekar’s single page suggests to me that GRRM wanted to save stuff for Dunk & Egg and Fire and Blood.
In many historical novels I’ve heard, it seems like wine is a basic necessity. The nobles and generals have to procure it for their soldiers, their servants and even their slaves, and the instances when a protagonist drinks water can be counted on one hand. Is that accurate? Wasn’t it easier and cheaper to drink water?
This isn’t entirely true in my understanding, Steven.
My own learning as a pure layman is that most people did drink mostly water. When clean water was available (or even not-that-clean-but-passable-water) that was what they drank.
However.
Much historical fiction, and indeed much historical writing, takes place in contexts where clean water wasn’t readily available, or with social classes that had ready access to the finer things in life. Armies on the march tended to befoul the fuck out of any water source they came across. Cities were just cesspits of disease, poisoning the rivers and water tables they were built on for leagues around. And in those contexts people are going to be drinking beverages with alcohol in them because, indeed, it is either much safer, or they’re of a social class where they can afford it. Because we’re not reading about the 90% of the country that lives a rural lifestyle and mostly drinks mostly water they pull from wells, streams, and rivers, with the occasional alcoholic drink mixed in.
I could be wrong here, tho.
Consider this a placeholder until I find the post where I did the research on the royal decree that limited inns to one per village, because people liked to drink just that damn much.
Ok, I knew I had read this somewhere. So to give one example of how much medieval people loved their booze: in 965, King Edgar the Peaceable of England issued a royal decree that there could only be one alehouse per village, “and had pegs put in the drinking cups to mark how much any person might consume at a single draught.” So in a country of between 1-2 million people living in 13,000 towns and villages (which suggests around 153 people per village), there were at least two alehouses per village (or one alehouse per 76 people).
See, the thing about the “rural lifestyle” is that it usually gives you the raw materials to brew your own ale and beer and then sell the surplus to your neighbors. To quote from Margaret Schaus’ Women and Gender in Medieval Europe:
People did drink water, but the cleanliness of the water was quite iffy, so people tended to drink alcohol as it was safer.
Ale was the common drink of people in northern Eirope; it also played a prominent part in medieval culture. Safer to drink than water, the grain-based beverage provided an important part of people’s daily nutritional requirement…for most of the Middle Ages, brewing was dominated by women. Because of its importance, ale’s production and sale became subject ot extensive regulation; as a result, alewives (women who brewed and/or sold ale) are much more visible in the records than most other medieval female workers.
In England, the late thirteenth century assize of ale, enforced by local officials, regulated the price and quality of ale…brewing was a domestic skill expected of medieval women, Because ale spoiled quickly, many rural households alternated between brewing their own ale and selling any surplus, and purchasing it from neighbors. Brewing for sale was a part time occupation, undertaken to supplement household income…
…demand for ale increased with rising living standards after the Black Death, providing more opportunities for women to earn a full- or part-time living from brewing…in England there was an increase in the number of alehouses…
And then hopped beer spread out of Germany into Northern Europe starting in the 14th century, and as hopped beer “lasted longer and could be made in larger quantities,” you get even more booze, now produced more by men who could afford to make the “greater capital outlay” required to brew hopped beer.
No matter how cruel he could be, Bloodraven was still a smart man and a major Targaryen supporter. You think he would have realized that ignoring the problems with the Ironborn and helping out would better both the realm and House Targaryen, so why was he so willing to ignore it just because he “feared” a Blackfyre rebellion happening again? He knew what he was doing and knew that not doing anything would make the Targs he worked hard to preserve look bad. So why do what he did?
Because Bloodraven is ultimately a believer in hard power rather than soft power; what mattered to him was making it impossible for the Blackfyre loyalists in Essos to cross and start another war, which he clearly saw as such an existential threat that he was willing to let everything else go to wrack and ruin to prevent.
In many historical novels I’ve heard, it seems like wine is a basic necessity. The nobles and generals have to procure it for their soldiers, their servants and even their slaves, and the instances when a protagonist drinks water can be counted on one hand. Is that accurate? Wasn’t it easier and cheaper to drink water?
People did drink water, but the cleanliness of the water was quite iffy, so people tended to drink alcohol as it was safer.
This isn’t entirely true in my understanding, Steven.
My own learning as a pure layman is that most people did drink mostly water. When clean water was available (or even not-that-clean-but-passable-water) that was what they drank.
However.
Much historical fiction, and indeed much historical writing, takes place in contexts where clean water wasn’t readily available, or with social classes that had ready access to the finer things in life. Armies on the march tended to befoul the fuck out of any water source they came across. Cities were just cesspits of disease, poisoning the rivers and water tables they were built on for leagues around. And in those contexts people are going to be drinking beverages with alcohol in them because, indeed, it is either much safer, or they’re of a social class where they can afford it. Because we’re not reading about the 90% of the country that lives a rural lifestyle and mostly drinks mostly water they pull from wells, streams, and rivers, with the occasional alcoholic drink mixed in.
I could be wrong here, tho.
Consider this a placeholder until I find the post where I did the research on the royal decree that limited inns to one per village, because people liked to drink just that damn much.