anon who asked the question of sending Ned to the vale. Sorry i miswrote that, i meant from an in-universe point of view. surely it wouldve been better for Brandon to befriend Robert?

geekamarie:

racefortheironthrone:

It may well have been a timing issue – that Brandon was already fostered when Robert’s fostering came up. 

Was the point really befriending Robert? Or was it that Jon Arryn had an embarrassment of nieces and no direct descendants?

The point was to make an Arryn a foster father to a Stark and a Baratheon, and making a Stark and Baratheon foster brothers, thus linking those families together. 

Probably a stupid question, but where would the holdfasts be located that Ned would have received as a second son (or Bran, since there’s talk of him doing the same before his second career)? It seems like most of the lands/castles in Westeros are pretty well spoken for by the minor houses. Or do we not encounter these holdfasts in the books?

I don’t think we encounter the holdfast in question, but the Stark lands are extensive. 

So I know throughout the books we here the dragon has three heads, or three treasons, basically things are happening in threes. But if Euron steals a dragon and tries to “side” with The Others that just leaves two dragons soooo wouldn’t we just need two dragon riders, Dany and Jon, versus three. Like whats the point of the third head of the dragon especially if its Tyrion. Also on a semi related note what will drive Tyrion’s plot once The Long Night comes what role will he fill?

That assumes Euron gets to keep the dragon. You can recover stolen property, after all. 

I know that everyone accuses Ned of being terrible at politics. I don’t think he is (not saying he’s fantastic, but terrible is pushing it). Was he ever really trained at that sort of thing though? Brandon was the oldest brother and the one who was supposed to rule. Do you think that all the Stark brothers got an equal amount of “political education”?

I don’t think he is either. 

And yes, Ned would have received a political education, as a younger son might well end up governing a holdfast of his own. But he wouldn’t have been given as thorough an education – or perhaps it’s more accurate to say that the expectations of his performance would have been lower – as Brandon would have gotten. 

stefansasse:

racefortheironthrone:

aspis vs scutum?

These are two forms of shields used by the ancient Romans at various times. The aspis is theshield we think of when we think of the Greek hoplite and (pre-Alexandrian) phalanx: a large round shield, covered in bronze, and largely supported by the shoulder and the Argive grip. Borrowing as they had much of their military technology from the Greek-influenced Etruscans, the early Romans used this kind of shield quite heavily. 

However, the aspis wasn’t that well-suited to the more flexible and less tightly-packed ranks of the maniple (a tactical formation that the Romans borrowed from their neighbors the Samnites) and so the Romans replaced the aspis with the iconic scutum. By contrast, the scutum was a curved rectangle, with iron edging and an iron boss in the center of the shield:

Without all of that heavy bronze plating, the scutum was much lighter, so that it could be wielded easily in one hand without the need for shoulder support, which made it easier to hold up the shield while throwing the pilum or stabbing with the gladius, as opposed to relying solely on spear thrusts. Moreover, the longer scutum did a better job at covering the legs and feet during combat, so that despite being lighter than the apsis, it actually provided more protection. And finally, the scutum’s design allowed for tactical innovations: the testudo formation, for example, wouldn’t really work with the aspis because it would be more exhausting to lock shields and you wouldn’t be able to huddle together closely enough, leaving gaps.

So yeah, scutum all the way. 

So…why did they change to oval shields in the late Empire?

Well @warsofasoiaf would know better than me, but I would guess that it had a lot to do with the decline of infantry vs cavalry and the fact that scutum were pretty damn awkward to use on horseback.