I recently came across a theory on Tower of the Hand that speculated that Daenerys may not be a Targaryen at all, based on the cryptic messages of Quaithe to “remember who you are” and implying that her memories of the red door in Braavos aren’t the memories she believes them to be. I didn’t buy the suggestion that she might actually be the daughter of Ned Stark and Ashara Dayne, but the possibility that she’s a previously hidden Blackfyre doesn’t sound implausible. What are your thoughts?

No. Dany is Daenerys Targaryen, daughter of Aerys II and Rhaella Targaryen. Her birth was witnessed by servants, bannermen, and Viserys; it happened while the island was under naval blockade so there was no smuggling anyone in (it took the storm of a century to allow Ser Willem Darry to sneak through). 

On a metatexual level, GRRM is not M. Night Shyamalan, he doesn’t do twists out of nowhere or for no reason – if you go back to GRRM’s texts, he very carefully layers in huge amounts of foreshadowing in ways that make things super-obvious when you do a re-read. So if he wants a character’s identity to be open to question, as with Jon Snow, he puts in a huge amount of material pointing in that direction.

He didn’t do that with Dany. He did the opposite, repeatedly tying her back to House Targaryen. AGOT and ACOK are filled with references to Rhaegar, Aerys, prophetic visions of Rhaegar and Aerys, and so on and so forth.

How long and heavy would a bronze sword have been compared to an iron/steel sword? Would Valyrian Steel swords seem absurdly long to First Men warriors, or would they look more or less the same as what they were used to?

From what I’ve learned from a quick bit of research, the whole iron vs. bronze thing isn’t about hardness or weight or anything like that. Rather, if you can forge iron, it’s way more plentiful and doesn’t require access to both tin and copper. The ancient bronze world relied heavily on trade networks to get access to both, so if disrupted bronze cultures would have a hard time replenishing their weaponry whereas iron cultures wouldn’t. 

I would imagine this meant that when a bronze-using army encountered an iron-using industry, the issue is that the iron-using army could equip itself more cheaply and easily, so could afford to equip more soldiers than the bronze army could for the same amount resources. 

if they had any, what sort of valyrian steel weapons do you think house justman, teague and garnder would have? and what would be their names?

Well, not every House has to have a Valyrian sword, so I’m a little hesitant. I don’t think the Teagues would have had one, and if the Justmans ever had one it probably would have been lost with Bernarr II (although I like the name Balance). As for House Gardener, I like the idea of Longthorn (maybe Leo Tyrell nick-named himself after the famous blade?) – hat tip to @warsofasoiaf for that one.

what traditional “look” do you think the now extinct teagues, justmans and gardners had if they had any?

I don’t necessarily have headcanons for this stuff, so I’m going off the top of my dome here:

  • House Gardener should have the “look” of Garth Greenhand, who my headcanon is less this than this. So, handsome/beautiful in an earthy, slightly louche way (capable of running to fat if they don’t work off the calories from living the good life) that befits the descendants of a fertility god. I also like the idea of them having hair and eyes that are a mix of brown and gold, earth and the divine mixing. 
  • House Justman should be a mix of the “looks” of Houses Bracken and Blackwood. So the Brackens tend to be beefy but not tall and with brown hair and eyes, and the Blackwoods tend to have black hair, hooked noses, and tend to be goth as hell. So Justmans would probably have dark hair and eyes, a balanced physique (neither as wispy as the Blackwoods nor as blocky as the Brackens), and noses that are a careful balance between the two families.
  • House Teague were Andals, who tended to be fair-haired; beyond that, I don’t have any ideas. I like the idea of the Teagues as being short, because I like the idea of them as feisty bantamweights who don’t know when to give up. 

how could westeros ever manage a constitutional monarchy, when its internal structural and bureaucracy is less impressive than 1200 scandinavia. there is no way in hell it would ever last. the steps between constitutional monarchy and completely decentrilaized feudal monarchy is simply way to big to manage in a single rulers lifetime.

A constitutional monarchy and a modern constituional monarchy aren’t necessarily the same thing.