im a little confused throughout asoiaf Cersei states that Sansa is stupid but in Feast she apparently believes Sansa masterminded Joffreys murder and her own escape?

Cersei is trying to convince herself that Sansa is stupid, because that means Sansa isn’t a threat, as per the “younger and more beautiful” queen that will supplant her. 

After Joffrey’s murder, she shifts from denial to seeing Sansa as the threat from the prophecy (although she’ll later shift to see Margaery as that figure). 

How aware were nobles of other family’s lines of succession? For instance, if Jonos Bracken had died in the fighting, would Robb or Catelyn have reasonably known that Jonos had no legitimate sons but did have a nephew that would be the presumed heir? Does anyone other than the Freys keep track of how many Lannisters need to die before Genna’s kids get Casterly Rock? Could Edmure have had his eyes on heirless Harrenhal through his, or Cat in the future for Bran or Rickon as second sons?

Very. It’s all a part of playing the game of feudal politics: you need to know who’s married to whom and who’s related to whom so that you know what the competing claims for any given bit of land are, or what kin someone could call on during a war, and so on and so forth.

This is why young nobles are so rigorously schooled on heraldry and the like; it’s a system of mutual recognition, a kind of visual shorthand for dynastic claims.  

So to answer your questions: 

  1. Catelyn would definitely know, Robb might not. (Although you’d think he’d know that his family had a claim to Harrenhal after the seeming death of Lady Whent…) 
  2. Definitely any lord of the Westerlands would be keeping tabs on the succession of the Rock in the same way that politically savvy people keep tabs of who’s running for President (or Prime Minister). 
  3. Yes and yes. 

If the free cities are dependent on Latifunda to supply the food needed to feed their large populations, does that mean that getting rid of slavery, and thus the workers for these plantations, would lead to mass societial collapse due to not being able to feed the populations? Is it possible that such an event could/will occur in the wake of Daenerys’ ensuing crusade on her way to Westeros?

I would argue it would lead to mass societal change, not collapse, just as the abolition of slavery in our own history didn’t lead to collapse (despite many predictions from slaveholders that it would).

After abolition, you still have a workforce of farmers, you still have arable land, and you still have a market for cereal crops. The only thing that needs to change is how ownership and profits are distributed. 

What’s with Tywin driving off the Black Ears after the Blackwater? Not only does it belie the claim that “Lannisters pay their debts” but it creates a marauding band with a grudge in the crown’s destabilised lands.

He would argue the Lannisters had paid their debts, that he’d given them arms and armor in exchange for military service and was done.

But as for why he’s doing it, it’s primarily because he doesn’t want Tyrion to have his own military force inside the capital. 

I️ would donate plasma to hear your thoughts on the ridiculousness that was Werewolf: The Apocalypse.

opinions-about-tiaras:

racefortheironthrone:

No need to donate plasma, that might set off Frenzy…

Werewolf the Apocalypse was a bizarre fever dream of 90s influences. You had the whole enviro/new agey/appropriation of Native American stuff, which didn’t exactly fit in well with the cyberpunk stuff of the Glass Walkers and Bone Gnawers, the Shadow Lords and Silver Fangs being rather difficult to distinguish from Vampire clans, the shall we call them broad ethnic stereotypes of the Fianna or the Get of Fenris or the Silent Striders, etc.

Mostly, I would call Werewolf a bit too over-designed. Shape-shifting really should have been the central thing (although I think three forms rather than five would work better), but they added on Gnosis and the Umbra and spirits and spells and magic items on top of that. The three Breeds work (although the Metis stuff had problematic implications), but then they added on five Auspices and thirteen Tribes, and your character’s identity gets very complicated and blurry indeed. 

This was a problem with all three of their flagship gamelines, really. They threw everything and the kitchen sink into them, which was great in a lot of ways but became absolutely ridiculous if you thought about it for even a second.

The Mages had the same issue, where your play troupe could easily end up being a 1940s style mad scientist, a traditional robes-and-hat wizard with a spellbook, a death cultist, a nerd with a “trinary” computer, and an actual-factual druid. And you fought the Men in Black, evil cyborgs, Doctor Mengele, and magic-using corporate executives.

Now, that was super fucking awesome, but god, did it have a tendency to collapse under its own weight at times.

Vampire at least had the advantage that all of the vampire tropes meshed okay together, but even there if you started going too far afield of the Camarilla you slammed into dudes like the Followers of Set and the weirder shit they threw in to round out the Sabbat clans, to say nothing of the Kindred of the East.

Their minor gamelines, Hunter, Wraith, Changeling, etc. tended to be a lot more cohesive and thematically unified. Of course, this was back in the day when White Wolf had more money than god and even a tiny gameline like Hunter got a full-up fatsplat and tons of splatbooks. (It says something about how poorly Wraith did, despite being one of their best-designed games, that it managed to get cancelled at a time when White Wolf was publishing entire splatbooks about were-rats and were-alligators.)

Yeah, Mage was really OTT, especially given the extreme tension between a magic system that encouraged really far-out spells and the harsh penalties of Paradox.

But even Changeling, while more cohesive, was something of an overgrown hothouse of ideas. For example, its system of completely random requirements to cast spells (which didn’t really work well with a lot of character concepts) linked into a goddamn collectible card system. I bought some of those cards, impressionable teen that I was, and while the artwork was gorgeous, the damn things were completely useless. 

I’ve been reading a bit about the petrol nations, and how discovering extensive oil reserves in a country often has a kind of “hollowing out” effect on the nation’s economy unless they act to put certain safeguards in place, or are already a significantly developed economy at the time the oil reserves are found. I’m curious about whether there are any historical equivalents to the effect that oil reserve discoveries have on a nation-state, whether raw resources or otherwise.

Well, the resource curse doesn’t just have to do with oil…

image

And if you’re looking for a historical example, I would go with the Price Revolution that the Spanish Empire suffered after its conquest of the Americas, where a tidal wave of gold and silver did enormous, lasting damage to the Spanish economy. 

In a side note from your analysis of Jaime I in ASOS, you include the Brackens in a list with the Freys and Peakes as “asshole families”. What did the Brackens do? I know they don’t get along with the Blackwoods, or but I’ve always thought of that as feud without a clear antagonist or protagonist. Am I wrong?

So I use that term to suggest what the author’s feelings are, not necessarily my own.

But you just have to look at how GRRM has described the two houses to see which side he comes down on: the Blackwoods worship the Old Gods and have a cool weirwood tree for their sigil, the Brackens converted to the New Gods and have…a horse; Missy Blackwood is loved by all, but Barba Bracken is a callous schemer who gets exiled from court and her poor sister meets an even worse fate; Otho Bracken is a “brute” and won’t help Dunk; Jonos Bracken is a womanizing tool who sides (or is it “sides”?) with the Lannisters while Tytos Blackwood is an honorable Stark loyalist (with a kickass ravenfeather cloak); hell, when GRRM wants to have the Three Stooges enter his series, they show up as Bracken sworn swords!

So while I think the thematic argument that GRRM is trying to make is that both sides are equally to blame for the feud, his aesthetics aren’t matching up. Poets being of the devil’s party and so forth.