Thoughts on the Punisher? I find it interesting that such a small-time character (relatively speaking) has had not one, not two but three unrelated films that all flopped and were critically panned to boot. And yet, the Punisher was given a major role in Daredevil season 2 and now has his own series. Not to mention his numerous appearances in cartoons, and video games starring him. What I’m trying to say is that the character sure gets a lot second changes and I find it curious.

The Punisher gets used a lot because the character is very cheap. Because the character’s inspiration is from revenge thrillers – he predated the Death Wish and Rambo movies, but not the novels they were based on – Frank Castle is just a guy with a lot of guns who goes around killing people in familiar urban environments. 

Which means you don’t need colorful costumes or special effects for super-powers, you don’t need elaborate sets to stand in for alien planets, you don’t even need particularly good acting, because the audience’s interest is in the gunplay. Which means you can get by with the quite modest budgets that action movies used to be associated with.  

I’m not a fan of the character, personally. The danger of falling into some really reprehensible territory on race, guns, criminal justice, etc. is particularly intense, but even when writers avoid those traps, I find that the stories get very samey – Punisher goes up against bad guys, Punisher shoots bad guys, rinse and repeat – without the scope for innovation or whimsy that comes from the clever use of superpowers. 

Bottom line, I don’t think there’s much there to a character whose core conceit could be undone by a single sentence. 

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.