In your Davos III Chapter Analysis why do you refer to James II’s son as James III even though as far as I’m aware he’s never been considered such by English history? I’ve only ever heard him referred to by hiss full name as he was never an actual King of England and Ireland.

Well, he certainly claimed the title as did the Jacobites who followed him, but I mostly used that title to make it clear that James III followed the claim of James II. 

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.