Could Catlyn legally take Tyrion and not expect consequences? Abducting the Queen’s brother, placing him on trial without recourse (denying him counsel or the champion of his choice), and civil war is the minimum fallout

Your language is a little loaded there: arrested vs. abducted, there aren’t attorneys in Westeros, Catelyn wasn’t the one denying him a champion of his choice.

But civil war as the minimum fallout? No. 

Yes, Catelyn should have expected political repercussions – the queen had every right to complain to the king about her brother’s treatment and the king had the right to order Ned to give Tyrion up – but she was operating fully within the law and the Lannisters should have responded in kind, especially with their superior political position.

But Tywin making war on a third party is wildly disproportionate to the offense, at a time when the Lannisters had many alternatives. 

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.