Thanks for the Golden Tooth reply. As a follow up: Stannis said that Aegon saw Westeros as “One realm, for one king to rule alone”. My Q is not about the Pros vs Cons of Aegon’s Draconacy, but about Aegon’s specific Draconic doctrine. You suggested that he could have claimed the GT as a crown possession. Expanding on this wouldn’t an ideal doctrine then be to further control inter-paramount politics by also claiming the Bloody Gate, Moat Cailin and **Skyreach. Your thoughts are eagerly awaited.

If Aegon didn’t have the dragons, that would be a pretty good policy if your objective is to unify previously warring kingdoms and prevent interregional warfare. 

However, I firmly believe that Aegon felt the dragons obviated all of that. Harrenhal was all the proof he needed that fortresses meant nothing, when he could rain fiery death from the sky at will and, more importantly, when everyone in Westeros knew what he could do. 
 

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.